User talk:Anne Maxight

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Anne Maxight, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 17:00, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of The Backyardigans episodes, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. HalfShadow 17:12, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to List of The Backyardigans episodes, you may be blocked from editing. HalfShadow 22:24, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of The Backyardigans episodes

{{helpme}} I would like to try and improve the mentioned article, but I seem to have caused grief with someone on that page. If you look at the edit summaries and comments on the talk page of the article, it seems as if I am being told not to help out. Is there away to work this out? Possibly someone can look at what I would like to do (see talk page) and let me know if I am off base. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Anne Maxight (talk) 22:53, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss it with the user you have issues with, and if they seem to be trying to own the article, find a form of dispute resolution. —fetch ·comms 23:50, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List work

Your best bet is to look at WP:FL (in particular recently promoted FLs) on a similar subject. If, for example, you're looking to work on a list of [TV show] episodes list, look at recently promoted episode lists and season lists for the general format and style. Staxringold _talk^contribs 23:30, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Backyardigans Improvements

In general, it is a good list to go from. There are probably some things I'd cut out but the pages I typically work with (which are Smallville related), have to be able to cover 10 years with of stuff. If you want to look over multiple FL class lists, I'd suggest looking at Category:FL-Class television articles. There are ample to choose from; some are better than others, and some are outdated and probably need to be upgraded or delisted. I think being about to look over all kinds will help you out better in the long run. If you find some that look questionable, or some that look really good, then I would suggest going to the talk page of the article and looking at "Milestones". See when it was listed. That would give you an idea of how well it's stood up to changes in the structure of LOE pages. That said, I'd also look at WP:MOSTV, which covers LOE pages. If there is a specific question I can help you address, feel free to ask. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 00:29, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So far...

...you've gotten away with it. Stick to the straight and narrow, and you might be able to stay here. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 01:10, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Axmann8 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

NW (Talk) 03:36, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anne Maxight (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

NW, I am not Axmann8/banned or blocked user. Please advise on how I am to contest the above or what info is needed to show this is not the case. I am assuming that there is some reason that I have been tagged as Axmann8. Can I know why so that I might refute? It is difficult to contest with out a reason. Thank you. Anne Maxight (talk) 21:20, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I've reviewed your edits, and it's clear that you aren't a new user. It seems reasonable to think that User:Axmann8 is your original account; if I'm wrong, and you'd like to share the name of the other account or accounts you've used, you are welcome to do so. Because the use of multiple accounts is inherently dishonest, it's very hard to get unblocked once you've done it. Combine that with the white supremacy, which tends to bring the encyclopedia into disrepute, and I think that you're going to need to accept that, while you're welcome to read Wikipedia, you won't be editing it again. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:33, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.