User talk:Anne1965

Welcome!

Hello, Anne1965, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Dr Ghulam Nabi Kazi, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Usb10 ^Connected? 18:24, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dr Ghulam Nabi Kazi

The article Dr Ghulam Nabi Kazi has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Usb10 ^Connected? 18:24, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Elsa Kazi.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Elsa Kazi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Peripitus (Talk) 12:02, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sir Lancelot Graham.jpg

Hello. I have to say that it is not likely that File:Sir Lancelot Graham.jpg is your own work, as we understand that term on Wikipedia. You will have scanned it, but it is the work of whoever took the photograph in the first place. This is all explained at Wikipedia:Image use policy.

If this image is not to be deleted, we would need to know where it came from. Was it from a book, or newspaper, or something else? If so, which book, or whatever. Is there a caption to the image that says who the photographer was, or perhaps a photo credit somewhere in the book or newspaper? If we have this information, we can fix the license on the image. Photographs taken in India are copyrighted for sixty years following publication, so it is very likely that a photograph this old is in the public domain. But we do need to have this information I mentioned to determine that.

Thanks in advance for your help, Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:31, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr Ali Ahmed S Kazi.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Dr Ali Ahmed S Kazi.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 15:49, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Khan Bahadur Ghulam Nabi Kazi

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Khan Bahadur Ghulam Nabi Kazi, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://pakistaniat.com/category/ghulam-nabi-kazi.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:50, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Allama I I Kazi.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Allama I I Kazi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 17:20, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Dr Ghulam Nabi Kazi.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Dr Ghulam Nabi Kazi.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:02, 6 October 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 19:02, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Sir Lancelot Graham.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Sir Lancelot Graham.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:02, 6 October 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 19:02, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Dr Ghulam Nabi Kazi. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Usb10 ^Connected? 20:17, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bashir Ghulam Nabi Kazi

Hi, I hate to bother you, but do you have any references to prove this person is notable? This article has many serious issues. Please fix the issues tagged in the article. Bearian (talk) 20:49, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elsa Kazi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sindhi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:13, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ghulam Nabi Kazi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghulam Nabi Kazi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghulam Nabi Kazi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. agtx 21:08, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Dr Mutawakkil Kazi.jpg

The file File:Dr Mutawakkil Kazi.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:31, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]