Jump to content

User talk:Anna Balestrieri

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jerusalem school of Slavic studies (February 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Lapablo (talk) 12:48, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Anna Balestrieri! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lapablo (talk) 12:48, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your AFC Submission

[edit]

Hello Anna,

I have moved an article you submitted on your user talk page to Draft:Jerusalem school of Slavic studies you can find it there. Best regards Lapablo (talk) 12:50, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roman Davidovich Timenchik (February 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CaptainEek were:
The submission appears to be written in 1. This is the English Language Wikipedia; we can only accept articles written in the English Language. Please provide a high-quality English Language translation of your submission. Otherwise, you may write it in the 1 Wikipedia.
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Needs more references (cited inline, see WP:ERB for an excellent how-to), a general cleanup for grammar and format, and ensuring that it is written chiefly in English.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:31, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moshe Taube (July 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.
You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Moshe Taube

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Moshe Taube requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:35, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moshe Taube (July 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Prahlad balaji was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 00:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jerusalem School of Slavic studies

[edit]

Hello, Anna Balestrieri. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jerusalem School of Slavic studies".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:08, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Anna Balestrieri/sandbox/Alexander Kulik

[edit]

Hello, Anna Balestrieri. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/Alexander Kulik".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Techie3 (talk) 10:31, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Roman Davidovich Timenchik

[edit]

Hello, Anna Balestrieri. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Roman Davidovich Timenchik".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:14, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roman Davidovich Timenchik1 (October 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GeneralPoxter was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
GeneralPoxter (talk) 23:39, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roman Davidovich Timenchik has been accepted

[edit]
Roman Davidovich Timenchik, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 08:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Anna Balestrieri, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:51, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moshe Taube (linguist) (November 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ReaderofthePack was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I'm declining this for now - this needs in-line citations to help show what source backs up which claim. This also needs to be whittled down to focus on the basics - essentially, rather than listing all of his works in prose format it would be better to focus on the gist of what Taube's work focuses on. I also did some basic separation into sections, but this needs to be organized into sections a little better, especially if the content can't be reduced a little further. Good examples of what the article should look like can be found at Edgar C. Polomé and Noam Chomsky as they are of Good Article quality, meaning that they're some of the best articles on Wikipedia. The articles on Harold Innis and Eric A. Havelock are of Featured Article quality, meaning that they are the cream of the crop, the very best of the very best articles on here. They all deal with linguists so they can provide a good overview. This brochure on creating/editing biographical articles may help as well!
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:59, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Anna Balestrieri, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. I removed the copyvio from the article, but make sure that you're very careful about this! Thank you. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:00, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Kulik

[edit]

Alexander Kulik is an Israeli philologist and historian (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem). Trained at MGU, Hebrew University, Harvard. Alexander Kulik’s research concentrates on the cross-cultural transmission of texts and ideas. His scholarly interests encompass Slavic and Jewish studies. He received his Ph.D. from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and conducted post-doctoral research at Harvard University. Kulik authored four books: Retroverting Slavonic Pseudepigrapha (two editions: Society of Biblical Literature: Atlanta GA, 2004 and Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2005), 3 Baruch: Greek-Slavonic Apocalypse of Baruch (Berlin-New York: De Gruyter, 2009), Biblical Pseudepigrapha in Slavonic Tradition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016; with S. Minov), and Jews in Old Rus’: A Documentary History (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press for HURI, forthcoming) and edited seven volumes, among them, the collected volume History of the Jews in Russia: From Antiquity to Early Modern Period in the bilingual series with Zalman Shazar Center (Jerusalem, 2010) and Gesharim (Moscow, 2010) and the Guide to Early Jewish Texts and Traditions in Christian Transmission (Oxford-New York, 2019: Oxford University Press; as editor-in-chief, with G. Boccaccini, L. DiTommaso, D. Hamidovic, and M. Stone). In 2010 he won the ERC grant for the project “Jews and Slavs in the Middle Ages.” Together with Moshe Taube he initiated and headed the international research group “Cultural Archaeology of Jews and Slavs: Medieval and Early Modern Judeo-Slavic Interaction and Cross-Fertilization” held at the Hebrew University Institute of Advanced Studies in 2011. Currently Kulik is directing the project “The Bible in Russian Modernism” (with Roman Timenchik; funded by ISF). He has founded and headed the Brill book series Studia Judaeoslavica. Presently he serves as Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of Russian and Slavic Studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Alexander Kulik has held visiting positions at Moscow SU, UC London, Stanford, Oxford, Freie Universität Berlin, and Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia. He is Member of the International Committee of Slavists.

SELECTED PUBLICATIONS:

1. Books

  • Retroverting Slavonic Pseudepigrapha: Towards the Lost Original of the Apocalypse of Abraham. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2004 (first edition—paperback) and Leiden—Boston: Brill Academic Publishers, 2005 (second edition—hardback).
  • 3 Baruch: Greek-Slavonic Apocalypse of Baruch. Berlin—New York: Verlag Walter de Gruyter, 2009.
  • Biblical Pseudepigrapha in Slavonic Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015 (with Sergei Minov)

2. Edited Volumes

  • History of the Jews in Russia: From Antiquity to Early Modern Period. In Russian: Jerusalem—Moscow: Gesharim —Mosty Kultury, 2010. In Hebrew: Jerusalem: Zalman Shazar Center for Jewish History, 2010.

3. Selected Articles and Chapters

  • “On the Lost Greek Book of Esther.” Slavianovedenie 2 (1995), pp. 76—80.
  • “Notes on Novgorodian Birch Bark Letters.” Russian Linguistics 19 (1995), pp. 381—390 (with V. Orel).
  • “Notes on Old Kievan Graffiti” (Russian). Archaeologia (1995), pp. 124—132 (with V. Orel).
  • “On a Church Slavonic Hapax Legomenon.” Palaeoslavica 5 (1996), pp. 339—345.
  • “On the Dating of the Apocalypse of Abraham. In Memoriam Ja. S. Lurie. St. Petersburg: Athenium—Phoenix, 1997, pp. 189—197
  • “Slavonic Texts of the Cheirograph Legend, Assembled and Translated.” Michael E. Stone. Adam’s Contract with Satan: The Legend of the Cheirograph of Adam. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 2002, pp. 27—28, 33—34, 37—39, 117—120.
  • “Reconstruction and Interpretation.” Apocrypha 13 (2002), pp. 203—226.
  • “The Gods of Nahor: On the Pantheon of the Apocalypse of Abraham.” Journal of Jewish Studies 54.2 (2003), pp. 228—233.
  • “On Jewish Presence in Vohlynia in the 12th—13th Centuries.” Jewish-Polish and Jewish Russian Contacts (= Jews and Slavs 11). Jerusalem—Gdańsk, 2003, pp. 194—202.
  • “Textual Criticism and Retroversion.” Judeo-Bulgarica, Judeo-Russica et Palaeoslavica (= Jews and Slavs 15). Jerusalem—Sofia, 2005, pp. 313—323.
  • “Polysemantics vs. Homography.” Quadrivium: Festschrift in Honor of Prof. Wolf Moskovich. Jerusalem: Hebrew University Center for Slavic Languages and Literatures, 2006, pp. 25—32.
  • “Jews of Medieval Rus': to the Research Methodology” (Hebrew). Peamim 111-112 (2007), pp. 185—208.
  • “Judeo-Greek Legacy in Medieval Rus’.” Viator 39.1 (2008), pp. 51—64.
  • “Jews of Old Rus’: Sources and Historical Reconstruction.” Ruthenica 7 (2008), pp. 52—70.
  • “The Earliest Evidence on the Jewish Presence in Western Rus'.” Harvard Ukrainian Studies 27.1-4 (2009 [2004—05], pp. 13—24.
  • “Genre Without a Name: Was There a Hebrew Term for ‘Apocalypse’?” Journal for the Study of Judaism 40 (2009), pp. 540—550.
  • “The Mysteries of Behemoth and Leviathan’ and the Celestial Bestiary of 3 Baruch.” Le Muséon (2010) 122.3—4, pp. 307—345.
  • “Veritas Slavica: On the Value of Slavonic Evidence for the Early Apocalyptic Tradition.” Polata Knigopisnaia: an Informational Bulletin Devoted to the Study of Early Slavic Books, Texts and Literature 38 (2010), pp. 1—65.


  • “Apocalyptic Message and Method: the Case of 3 Baruch.” Henoch 32.1 (2010), pp. 130—153.
  • “Slavic Apocrypha and Slavic Linguistics.” Christfried Böttrich, Lorenzo DiTommaso, with the assist. of Marina Swoboda (eds.). The Old Testament Apocrypha in the Slavonic Tradition: Continuity and Diversity. Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011.
  • “The Jews of Slavia Graeca: the Northern Frontier of Byzantine Jewry?” Reuven Bonfil, Oded Irshai, Guy Stroumsa, and Rina Talgam (eds.). Jews of Byzantium: Dialectics of Minority and Majority Cultures. Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2012, pp. 297-316.
  • “Jews from Rus’ in Medieval England.” Jewish Quarterly Review 102.3 (2012), pp. 371-403.
  • “How the Devil Got His Hooves and Horns: Towards the Origin of the Motif.” Numen: International Review for the History of Religions 60 (2013), pp. 195—229.
  • "Jews and the Language of Eastern Slavs.” Jewish Quarterly Review 104.1 (2014, forthcoming), pp. 105—143.

Anna Balestrieri (talk) 13:39, 4 December 2020 (UTC) <http://pluto.huji.ac.il/~akulik/> <https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=MKl6seMAAAAJ&hl=en> <https://global.oup.com/academic/product/biblical-pseudepigrapha-in-slavonic-tradition-9780199590940?cc=il&lang=en&> <http://merhav.nli.org.il/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do;jsessionid=76BFDC40D5A7D4024A157F0E6F395652?fn=search&vl(freeText0)=%D0%9A%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BA+%D0%90%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B4%D1%80&tab=default_tab&mode=Basic&scp.scps=scope%3A(NNL_YBZ)%2Cscope%3A(NNL_MUSIC_AL)%2Cscope%3A(NNL_ALEPH)%2Cscope%3A(NNL_ARCHIVE_AL)%2Cscope%3A(NNL01_Bitmuna)%2Cscope%3A(NNL_CAHJP)%2Cscope%3A(NNL-Journals)%2Cscope%3A(Ephemera_NNL01)&vid=&ct=suggestedSearch&vl(452080141UI1)=all_items&vl(127845559UI0)=creator> <https://www.unive.it/data/persone/11172664> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexander-kulik-57968a25/?originalSubdomain=il> <https://www.husj.harvard.edu/authors/188/alexander-kulik> <https://shamash.academia.edu/AlexanderKulik/CurriculumVitae>[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Roman Davidovich Timenchik

[edit]

Hello, Anna Balestrieri. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Roman Davidovich Timenchik".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:17, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jerusalem School of Slavic studies

[edit]

Hello, Anna Balestrieri. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jerusalem School of Slavic studies".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 14:56, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Anna Balestrieri/sandbox/Alexander Kulik

[edit]

Hello, Anna Balestrieri. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/Alexander Kulik".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:32, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Moshe Taube (linguist)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Anna Balestrieri. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Moshe Taube (linguist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jerusalem School of Slavic studies

[edit]

Hello, Anna Balestrieri. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jerusalem School of Slavic studies".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:02, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Alexander Kulik

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Anna Balestrieri. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alexander Kulik, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Moshe Taube (linguist)

[edit]

Hello, Anna Balestrieri. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Moshe Taube".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:02, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anna_Balestrieri&oldid=1093836108"