User talk:AnnWhitney

Re: ProScout

It still sounds like it was written by the company. Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view. Perhaps reading that page will help you. For example the "ProScout Concept" section sounds like it's saying why ProScout is better than other similar companies, which is not the job of Wikipedia. If you can find unbiased reliable sources that say why THEY or why most people think that ProScout is superior, you can cite them and then put that in the article. --Evan ¤ Seeds 03:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting it and starting from scratch isn't a bad idea, but may not be entirely necessary. To do so, just delete all the text in a edit page and start over. I would advise against saving the page while empty, as someone may not realize it's under construction and delete it. As i said earlier, try to find reliable unbiased sources, and use them. Also, responding is better on this page, not your user page, which should talk about you. --Evan ¤ Seeds 03:20, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all your help. --AnnWhitney (talk) 03:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)AnnWhitney[reply]

It's my pleasure. And remember, just because I put the advertisement template on there, doesn't mean I have to take it off. If you think ProScout is sufficiently neutral sounding, feel free to remove the template. --Evan ¤ Seeds 03:53, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Biff and Charlie

A tag has been placed on Biff and Charlie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Nuttah (talk) 13:40, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of I Can Drink If I Want

The article I Can Drink If I Want has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable children's play, does not meet the WP:GNG guideline

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 08:37, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Parent Zone

The article The Parent Zone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only superficially mentioned in sources. As it aired in just one market I see nothing better

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:11, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Steve Spots

The article The Steve Spots has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only aired in one market, sources are from that market. No better sources found

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:04, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]