User talk:Ankitasdeveloper

Copyright problem: Vijay Chandru

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Vijay Chandru, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.iisc.ernet.in/centenary-conf/vijay.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Vijay Chandru and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Vijay Chandru, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Vijay Chandru with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Vijay Chandru. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Vijay Chandru saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Cassandra 73 (talk) 21:03, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm afraid that your note at the talk page of this article may reflect a misunderstanding of public domain. Material may be made public, that doesn't mean it is public domain. Public domain material is not copyrighted either because it is ineligible for copyright (for example, works of the United States government are copyright ineligible, although works of most other governments are not), because the copyright holder has explicitly released it into public domain (a copyright notice is not required to establish copyright) or because the term of copyright protection has lapsed. In the United States, most material published before 1923 is public domain. (See Wikipedia:Public domain.)

Wikipedia's rules on using previously published text are set out at Wikipedia:Copyrights. Unless the material can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with our Terms of Use, we can only use brief excerpts clearly marked in accordance with non-free content policy and guideline.

Your rewrite to that article has addressed copyright concerns, with the exception of one remaining sentence, which I have removed. The earlier, problematic version of the article has been deleted.

If you have questions about this, please let me know at my talk page. And allow me to offer you a very belated welcome to Wikipedia, as it seems you escaped that when you registered. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:36, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

Sure, there is nothing there that warrants a separate article. We don't break out individual departments in universities unless they are of particular note and nothing you have written and nothing I can find on the internet suggests this is the case. --Cameron Scott (talk) 10:45, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to WikiConference India 2011

Hi Ankitasdeveloper,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

An Invite to join the WikiProject Education in India

- - - - - - - - - - - - WikiProject Education in India - - - - - - - - - - - -

Hi, Ankitasdeveloper, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the Indian Education ! The WikiProject Indian Education is an evolving and expanding WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories and Wikiprojects, to do with anything related to Indian Education System(Schools,Colleges and Universities).
As you have shown an interest in article related to Education in India we thought you might like to take an interest in this growing WikiProject.Thank you for your contributions.
We look forward to welcoming you to the project ! To join the project please click here

naveenpf (talk) 19:14, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox W3C standard

Template:Infobox W3C standard has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:16, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox W3C standard

Template:Infobox W3C standard has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox technology standard. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:47, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gainsight for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gainsight is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gainsight until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jupitus Smart 18:45, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. King (film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mr. King (film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Atlantic306 (talk) 21:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mr. King (film) (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No sources. Please see this guide for adding citations along with the notability guidelines for films.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mr. King (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mr. King (film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 15:53, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ankitasdeveloper! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 15:53, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mr. King (film) (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mr. King (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mr. King (film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 01:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mr. King (film)

Hello, Ankitasdeveloper. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mr. King (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:28, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]