User talk:Anjana patel

Hello Ms Anajana Patel There are better ways to discuss Ms Anjana. Well, I certainly dont know if Aashish Khan does write Ustad or not. But he certainly does not write Pandit (but you wrote Pandit before his name). As a media person working in Indian capital and UK, I am fully aware that neither does Aashish Khan writes Pandit. But even if he does not write Ustad, people have the right to say him Ustad. You should not write Pandit Aashish Debsharma however!!! Neither is that a symbol of maturity. There are some great people from India in whose lives "everybody" should not interfere, may one be their student or anybody. Do you get the point now? I hope you do. Cool down and be responsible. I am sure you have not come here to fight!!! Neither do I. I am a busy media person. But my only responsibility is to check truths. Best wishes from MeghMalhar 10:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't try to vandalise Aashish Khan's page now! I am going to report this to Aashish Khan as well as to wikipedia. He has taken the surname of Debsharma for sure. But he has not left the Khan surname. You don't certainly know Aashish Khan better than he himself. So what's your business here??? Don't you have any work of your own? Also Ms Patel my request is that please remove all Indian origins from your name before telling India "another country". Also, please refrain from providing input in subjects not known to you. Wikipedia is neither your playground. You have not certainly seen Aashish Khan's legal documents when he accepted the surname of Debsharma. There it was written that from now on he will be known as Ustad Aashish Khan Debsharma. OK? Learn it and say thank you to who taught it to you?

And yes, you must provide documentary evidence to Vasant Rai's article. Otherwise, no one, not even the Wikipedia USA moderators will leave this page from deleting. Withour evidences, no laudatory articles can be kept here. Rather than naming the frets magazine references, give references in proper and wikipedian way. If you don't know how to provide references, then learn it first, and then come to wikipedia for editing articles. Is that clear?

Choicest wishes MeghMalhar 06:28, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ha ha i'll go ahead and tell ashishda myself warmest regards Anjana

Excuse me but whom are you talking to. I do not learn Sarode. But it is just not a fair thing to provide unreferenced articles at wikipedia. Someone may be great, or may not be - that's not my business as a wikipedian. As a wikipedian, my business is to see that unreferenced articles should not exist here. And that's it. Whoever one is, and however great one may be, a biography on him/her should always be referenced. What will you say to User:SmackBot when he/she puts an unreferenced tag to your article? Every article should be referenced. And go ask your folks and be confirm that you are making mistake about my identity. I do not learn Sarode. Neither do I belong to a young generation!!!

Thank you for your being polite anyway.

Message from Chandranandan

Excuse me Ms Patel but who is this thatgatha? I dont understand who are you talking about!!!! You earlier told me I learn Sarode and all that !!! Well surely you are getting confused with identities!!! I guess if you are modest enough then you should apologise!!! Neither do I learn Sarode!!! Nor am I anyone's student!!! Funny!!! Here in Australia no Indian teaches Sarode!!! Can you please clarify what you say? I can find no head and tail of all you said!!!

Anyway, as my fellow Australian Riana Dzasta has said, you must write neutral articles. Everyone should write neutral articles about everything. About Ali Akbar Khan, or Ravi Shankar, or Britney Spears or Aashish Khan or Zubin Mehta or Vasant Rai or Madonna whoever may be --- we must write neutral articles. I will certainly check if there is anything which is not neutral at Ali Akbar Khan's article. Thank you for mentioning that to me. Anyway, even if we write something like "greatest" or similar, we must provide reference in terms of source, page number, issue number, exact quotation, and exact website ----- which you certainly did not give in Vasant Rai's article.

DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE ISSUE? AND PLEASE DO NOT MIX UP MY IDENTITY WITH ANYONE ELSE --- WHOEVER THE SHIT MAY BE. OK?

Love and wishes and best of luckChandronandan 10:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC) - Chandronandan 10:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Pradeep Barot

A tag has been placed on Pradeep Barot, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Nenyedi ^TalkContribs_@ 01:12, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Vasant Rai

Please stop. If you continue to remove content from pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 14:04, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The version which you're insisting is deeply PoV, and is in poor English. Please stop. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 12:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I warned you not to delete other people's comments from Talk pages.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 18:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've continued to vandalise the Talk page from an IP address; I've therefore increased the block length. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 08:53, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Anjana patel! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 69 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Pradeep Barot - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:18, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pradeep Barot

The article Pradeep Barot has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, Lack of coverage from reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KH-1 (talk) 11:29, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]