User talk:Anita escobar

Welcome!

Hello, Anita escobar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Vsmith (talk) 00:36, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide edit summaries which provide explanation/reasons for your edits. --Vsmith (talk) 00:36, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Azerbaijan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:39, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On the map of Azerbaijan

Excuse me, but the disputed territory is NOT under Azerbaijan's control. I've never seen anybody want to make it seem like a country has control over a territory it doesn't. Go look at Ukraine's Wikipedia page, and Moldova's, and Cyprus, and Serbia's. The disputed territory is marked LIGHT GREEN. You have NO RIGHT to keep changing it. Anita escobar (talk) 22:48, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anita escobar, please make your comments on the article's talk page, at Talk:Azerbaijan#Map and caption, thanks. I would also ask you to try to have a calm, civil conversation about it there, and avoid personal comments about other editors - and the use of all-caps :) I understand it can be frustrating when someone reverts your edits, especially if they don't give an explanation you can understand. Try to assume they just want to help make Wikipedia better, and sometimes it's just miscommunication. The best solution is to talk it over and find a consensus. --IamNotU (talk) 02:01, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Your recent editing history at Azerbaijan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Anita escobar, you have just broken the three-revert rule. ~~Please understand that you now have a very short period of time to revert yourself, by undoing your own last edit immediately, or you *will* be blocked from editing.~~[Edit: too late for that now. I won't request that you be blocked, unless you edit again, but anyone else may already do so.] It doesn't matter if you're right or wrong, you must discuss and settle the issue on the article's talk page! IamNotU (talk) 00:40, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Armenians

Hello Anita, Thank you for reverting back to the previous edit that Armenians are an ethnic group from the Armenian highlands of West Asia! Which is factually correct.

I just wanted to say that I do think you should have put in an edit summary. The editor who tried to claim Armenians were at a crossroads of Eastern Europe and west Asia brought up geopolitics and that Armenia is in the Council of Europe. Obviously his reasoning was incorrect as the 3500 year old ethnic groups origins have nothing to do with geopolitics. But again, I think stating this in the edit summary would have been beneficial. I also don't think the citation that you deleted didn't need to be deleted, as I it also confirmed Armenians were from West Asia and the descendants of Urartu. — Preceding unsigned comment added by QeeGeeBee (talk • contribs) 08:30, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]