User talk:Animum/Anti-long shortcut cabal

Haha Animum. This is funny. Too bad its just a joke - I think it could be actually a serious project, were it for real. Its a minor task when isolated, but a rather big project large-scale. -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 16:54, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Too bad there aren't many profusely long shortcuts out there. —« ANIMUM » 18:34, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. We could do with more typos, bad grammar, headaches and generally people getting tongue-tied on Wikipedia ;) -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 10:41, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't that why there's the WP:LOCE?

–Animum 21:43, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you mean WP:LEAGUEOFHARDWORKINGUNTIRINGCOPYEDITORSWHONEVERTAKEABREAKANDAREREALLYQUITEGOODATTHEIRJOB? That would be the shortcut any member of your cabal would create, yes? ;) -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 21:48, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Correct But it would be nuked from high-orbit relatively quickly, unfortunately...

–Animum 23:05, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, well WP:Oh I say, what are you doing? Come down from there at once! Really, you're making a frightful exhibition of yourself. is annoying also. GrooveDog (talk) (Review) 00:10, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We cannot take your opinion into consideration because you are not part of the cabal. –Animum 21:29, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

→<joke>I WILL MERGE THIS CABEL INTO A TASK FORCE AT THE LEAUGE OF COPYEDITORS IF IT'S THE LAST THING I DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</joke>

Seriously, I think it ought to become a serious LOC project.--216.118.68.193 (talk) 21:41, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]