User talk:Anikesh Majumder

September 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Salt Lake Stadium, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:06, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mohun Bagan A.C., without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —MBlaze Lightning ^T 08:01, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: QOIE (December 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Worldbruce was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia is for topics that have gained substantial attention from the world at large over a period of time. It is for articles about companies and products that have had significant and demonstrable effects. Based on the cited sources, QOIE received a minor blip of coverage when they issued a press release in October, and has had no noticeable effects in its short history.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:QOIE and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:QOIE, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Worldbruce (talk) 06:50, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Anikesh Majumder, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Worldbruce (talk) 06:50, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding references to the brand, QOIE, to marketing articles

Please stop adding references to the brand, QOIE, to marketing related articles such as Retail and Servicescape as you did recently. These references have now been deleted.

In both cases, the content was added inappropriately. In both cases, the edits were unexplained and you have been previously asked to ensure that you provide an explanation for all edits. In the case of "Retail", your edit was added to the lead section, taking that section to more than the permissable four paragraphs. A lead section provides an outline of the entire article is is not the place to add specific detail that is not in the article's body. In the case of "Servicescape" your edit was added to the section on the model's origins where it appears as unfocussed and irrelevant. In both cases, the source cited was simply a promotional piece for QOIE and made no claims of any trend towards the use of such applications, yet the way the content was added suggested that a trend was underway. In other words, the source cited failed to support the claim(s) being made in the article. In addition, in both cases, the reference format used created citation errors in the list of references at the end of the article. If you wish to contribute to Wikipedia, please take the time to learn how to use an appropriate referencing format (See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources). Finally, the mention of specific brand names is likely to be construed as spam, particularly when brands are not well-known or lack international coverage. (See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Spam) and will be deleted. BronHiggs (talk) 22:58, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]