User talk:AniceMathew

YO YO!! ANICE MATHEW'S IN THE HOUSE...YO YO, THATS RIGHT, ANICEMATHEW IS IN THE HOUSE, I'M ROCKING...COME ON YO YO YO!!

Aug 2013

HI Anice, thanks for your contribs to WP. However I reversed your change to the gross income for Billa II as it conflicts with the citation. If you want to change that number you will need to source it to a valid citation per WP:V and WP:RS. If you need help with anything please leave me a note on my talk page. Cheers!-- — Keithbob • Talk • 18:06, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop abusing people

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Sonakshi Sinha, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Sonakshi Sinha, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Canoe1967 (talk) 11:03, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lakshmi Rai, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kanchana and Telugu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chennai Express

Oops, I think we had some kind of edit conflict. Will try to fix the errors.----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 12:38, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete Tamil in the film box, more or less the half of the film is spoken in Tamil, isn't it? Hoerestimmen (talk) 23:18, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because you continued our discussion on my user page you will find my answer there. Hoerestimmen (talk) 21:34, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Happy New Year (2014 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marathi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dhanush (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to 3 (2012 film) and Polladhavan

Chennai Express (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Android

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Singam 2 audio front cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Singam 2 audio front cover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Singam 2 promotional poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Singam 2 promotional poster.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright violations

Please do not upload any more images that you do not own. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:27, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:47, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm LogX. I noticed that you recently removed some content from I (film) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! -- L o g X 19:32, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shahrukh Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Devdas (2002 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Chennai Express, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. I will not tolerate such disruptive editing. --Jionpedia ✉ 10:24, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Chennai Express, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Enough is enough, now stop. --Jionpedia ✉ 14:25, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Arrambam (soundtrack), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- L o g X 16:59, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Chennai Express promotions.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Chennai Express promotions.jpg, which you've attributed to http://www.teluguwishesh.com/cinema-movies-films-photo-gallery/3041-chennai-express-promotions-on-sets-of-comedy-nights/81579-mc-chennai-express-promotion-18.html. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:38, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Whats this?

YO YO!! ANICE MATHEW'S IN THE HOUSE...YO YO, THATS RIGHT, ANICEMATHEW IS IN THE HOUSE, I'M ROCKING...COME ON YO YO YO!! please don't use the talk page as a forum. Sohambanerjee1998 16:24, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Chennai Express promotions.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Chennai Express promotions.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:12, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Time's All-Time 100 Movies, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Adventures of Robin Hood and Laura (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:16, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 day for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:39, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking per this comment. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:40, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Chennai Express promotions.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Chennai Express promotions.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:07, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Chennai Express, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Resolve disputes instead of degrading the article by taking your anger out on that. Sohambanerjee1998 06:12, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Chennai Express marketing.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Chennai Express marketing.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:06, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning for repeated image-licensing violations. You have already been blocked once for this unacceptable behavior, so the next block will certainly be much longer. DMacks (talk) 17:26, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Abhi (talk) 20:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards and nominations received by Shahrukh Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deewana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:04, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jionpedia. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Chennai Express without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Let's discuss first, mate. Jionpedia ✉ 19:44, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Shahrukh-khan-and-filmfare-gallery.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Shahrukh-khan-and-filmfare-gallery.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:09, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Gauri Khan Fizza.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Gauri Khan Fizza.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 16:10, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Mayamohini poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mayamohini poster.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of highest-grossing Indian films worldwide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards and nominations received by Shahrukh Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IIFA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

This is for copyediting of plot section in Krrish 3. ---zeeyanwiki ^discutez 22:04, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Krrish 3, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Sohambanerjee1998 13:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Krrish 3

AM, No personal attack please, per this comment. Sohambanerjee1998 11:33, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Krrish 3, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Discuss first, or you'll soon have an ARV. Sohambanerjee1998 16:07, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nayantara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Raja Rani

Shahrukh Khan filmography (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Devdas (2002 film)

Vivek Oberoi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Omkara (film)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Krrish 3

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Krrish 3. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Abhi (talk) 15:12, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anice, I am referring you with a she, since your name comes off as that of a female. Please discuss the issue at here. Sohambanerjee1998 18:43, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but it exceeds the limit of 700 words as per WP:FILMPLOT. Sohambanerjee1998 13:09, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Shahrukh Khan

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shahrukh Khan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of [[User:{{subst:AniceMathew}}|{{subst:AniceMathew}}]] -- [[User:{{subst:AniceMathew}}|{{subst:AniceMathew}}]] ([[User talk:{{subst:AniceMathew}}|talk]]) 08:30, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi AniceMathew, I noticed you accidentally opened a page for your own GA nomination, which makes the system think you are the reviewer. I've marked it for deletion so that another reviewer can take this nomination later. You can see details of how the process works at WP:GAN/I.

Thanks for all your work revising this high-traffic article-- It should easily qualify for a Million Award, so let me know if it passes. Cheers, Khazar2 (talk) 12:23, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of disambiguation page

Hi, I noticed that you redirected SRK which was previously a disambiguation page. The disambiguation list should have been retained; I have now restored it at SRK (disambiguation). I also added a hatnote in the SRK article, so that people can find the disambiguation page again if they go to SRK.

Hope this helps. Feel free to ask for help if you need to make any such changes in the future. – Fayenatic London 21:55, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning.

Please stop the disruptive editing over at Krrish 3. You do make constructive edits but they are few and far in numbers when compared to the numerous content removals, change without WP:CONSENSUS or discussion. Making heaps of consecutive edits and not to mention blanking contents. Although I encourage you to make bold edits but please follow the WP:BRD cycle after that. Finally I would ask you to go through WP:MOSFILM and WP:MOS. Sohambanerjee1998 14:06, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Shahrukh Khan filmography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Clarkcj12 (talk) 01:34, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It may help with other contributors by putting an edit summary saying why you are deleting a huge section of an article, otherwise it looks like someone is doing vandalism. And also I would recommend getting an agreement from the other users of the community by doing at WP:RFC to decide if that information should be included. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 08:08, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SRK GA nom

Have u significantly contributed towards making Shahrukh Khan GA worthy? I suggest withdraw the nomination for now, because there are 28 dead links in the article, that can fail the GA review. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 08:11, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Enthiran and edit-summaries such as at Shahrukh Khan filmography. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. DMacks (talk) 11:46, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AniceMathew (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

See...this is not a request. I know I havent done anything wrong...in Shahrukh Khan filmography, i tried to prevent some mad vandalism and did it...I got pissed off and I had a reason. I am ordering you, whoever who blocked me, unblock or i'll find u and beat you up in front of your mother.

Decline reason:

No personal attacks please. They won't get you unblocked. (BTW don't bother trying to carry out that threat - it would be impossible in my case.) Peridon (talk) 19:04, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dhoom 3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CEAT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Shahrukh Khan

The article Shahrukh Khan you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Shahrukh Khan for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aisha Sequeira -- Aisha Sequeira (talk) 10:12, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User Page

Now that ur block term has ended, u r advised to re-edit ur user page so that it does not resemble mine. Because if two users have identical user pages, there may be an accusation of sock puppetry. Also, do U really have a hatred for American English? ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 02:21, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Dhoom 3, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Refrain from such edits. Soham (talk) 13:21, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Dhoom 3, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Refrain from cluttering the history by successive unnecessary edits. Try to edit in concise single ones. Soham 12:58, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mate, please stop your disruption. Please? This time when a poster was already there you decided to upload another with a comment/rationale Here we go vertical poster. It would have made some sense had the existing poster was a quad but unfortunately it was not. I hope you understand or you're going to have an Admin coming here. Soham 17:37, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Widr (talk) 01:20, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Serious_personal_attack_against_a_teenager --Tito☸Dutta 10:04, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Someguy1221 (talk) 10:27, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for attempting to harass other users. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jac16888 ^Talk 14:41, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AniceMathew (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry...I really am. I was just so stupid. You guys are already big editors and I was just so stupid to abuse one of you. This is a real confession and I dont know if anybody is going to forgive me so fast. I had to behave with more manners. I am learning from my mistakes, but please don't ask me to leave forever because I really miss this account. Anyways, I am very very sorry. Whoever sees this, I request them to let Soham know that I am really sorry....Trust me, punish me, but please don't walk away on me..I would like to come back, prove myself. I'm sure I'll try and become a better editor.

Decline reason:

If this were a one-time thing, I might consider finding a proposal for a reduced sentence, but this is your fifth block since September, and you have presented problems from almost day one that you've been here. I just can't see you having this major epiphany/change in such a short time after such a long history of issues. only (talk) 14:08, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(ANI Permalink) Please note that this user has also attempted to evade this block with sockpuppets - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AniceMathew--Jac16888 ^Talk 14:18, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AniceMathew (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

plz plz plz... i thought I could leave Wikipedia easily...but I cannot, I'm addicted to it....give me a last chance to prove myself. I will never again hurt the feelings of fellow editors....Believe me for once, please unblock me

Decline reason:

You've been here 6 months and have been blocked 4 times. You've had enough chances. And the fact that you think you were blocked just because you "hurt someone's feelings" suggest you don't even really understand why you were blocked, or how to work in a collaborative environment. Mr.Z-man 16:10, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The key to unblocking

Rather than creating a new account (and leaving strong evidence that u r a sock puppet), you could give a more noteworthy unblock request through your original account (at least write more formally and kindly). Kailash29792 (talk) 14:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AniceMathew, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Kailash29792 (talk) 15:29, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AniceMathew, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Kailash29792 (talk) 16:15, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AniceMathew, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Kailash29792 (talk) 04:10, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AniceMathew, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Kailash29792 (talk) 17:51, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AniceMathew, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Kailash29792 (talk) 15:17, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for a period of indefinite for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AniceMathew. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 23:19, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AniceMathew, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Kailash29792 (talk) 16:31, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AniceMathew, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Kailash29792 (talk) 17:10, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]