User talk:Angrywhiteguy20
Little context in 192D Ordnance Battalion (EOD)
[edit]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on 192D Ordnance Battalion (EOD), by 172.133.179.87 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because 192D Ordnance Battalion (EOD) is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting 192D Ordnance Battalion (EOD), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:41, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Little context in 63D Ordnance Battalion (EOD)
[edit]Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on 63D Ordnance Battalion (EOD), by 172.133.179.87 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because 63D Ordnance Battalion (EOD) is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting 63D Ordnance Battalion (EOD), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:53, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Little context in 79TH Ordnance Battalion (EOD)
[edit]Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on 79TH Ordnance Battalion (EOD), by 172.133.179.87 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because 79TH Ordnance Battalion (EOD) is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting 79TH Ordnance Battalion (EOD), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:53, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Little context in 84TH Ordnance Battalion (EOD)
[edit]Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on 84TH Ordnance Battalion (EOD), by 172.133.179.87 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because 84TH Ordnance Battalion (EOD) is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting 84TH Ordnance Battalion (EOD), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:53, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Little context in 242D Ordnance Battalion (EOD)
[edit]Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on 242D Ordnance Battalion (EOD), by 172.133.179.87 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because 242D Ordnance Battalion (EOD) is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting 242D Ordnance Battalion (EOD), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:54, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
License on Image:Jeff smith.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading an image of Sen. Jeff Smith. Have to ask, though: where'd you get it, and what's the copyright? - Jredmond (talk) 22:26, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Jeff smith.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading Image:Jeff smith.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 15:50, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
