User talk:AngeloADiamond

Speedy deletion nomination of Eliza Swenson

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Eliza Swenson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Archaios (talk) 20:49, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Eliza Swenson, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 20:52, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Eliza Swenson. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 22:32, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eliza Swenson

The article Eliza Swenson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not appear to be notable. Searching google news results finds some passing mentions of her appearance in films, but none of the results represent significant coverage about her. I was unable to locate any sources that would qualify as significant coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Monty ₈₄₅ 23:41, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eliza Swenson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eliza Swenson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eliza Swenson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 01:35, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Eliza Swenson has been reverted.
Your edit here to Eliza Swenson was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/eliza.swenson, http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Divine-Madness/227366937467) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:52, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Eliza Swenson. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Monty ₈₄₅ 20:26, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you might...

Please read WP:PRIMER to perhaps better understand what is required of articles for Wikipedia. Please also note that Facebook and IMDB are inappropriate for citations. What works for us are citations to articles about the actress or reviews of her work as a musican and composer.

See News articles about Eliza Swenson

See News articles about Victoria Mazze

I'm here to help. If you examine the work done to the article so far,[1] you'll see I have been busy. And too, please check WP:RS to better uderstand what sources are considered reliable. Best, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 08:53, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page The Witches of Oz do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.
Your edit here to The Witches of Oz was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=2280914699885) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:42, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Eliza Swenson, you may be blocked from editing. Monty ₈₄₅ 04:48, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

This is your last warning. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Eliza Swenson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Monty ₈₄₅ 05:08, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NOTICE

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. See dicussion here. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:44, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eliza Swenson

I've just closed the AFD on Eliza Swenson as "keep" so the article is no longer facing deletion at this time. However, in the future, please do not remove AFD notices for articles nominated for deletion. That notice must stay on the article until the discussion is closed by an administrator. However, you are welcome to state your views in the AFD discussion. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:44, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]