User talk:Angelicadustan

Welcome guys!

Angelicadustan, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Angelicadustan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

21:03, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kamran Sadeghi has been accepted

Kamran Sadeghi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 13:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (ProSci Incorporated) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating ProSci Incorporated, Angelicadustan!

Wikipedia editor Kieranian2001 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Reviewed as part of Page Curation. The article seems interesting and reasonably complete now.Kieranian2001 (talk) 16:34, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Kieranian2001's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Your submission at Articles for creation: ProSci Incorporated (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The references provided in this draft are almost entirely PRIMARY, having been authored by employees or released by the company itself. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ProSci Incorporated and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 18:51, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]