User talk:AndysCrogz1
This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of AndyCrogonka (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely. Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
Welcome!
Hello, AndysCrogz1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Yesse, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! A new name 2008 (talk) 01:37, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Yesse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. A new name 2008 (talk) 01:37, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
AndyzBot
[edit]Hi there. this edit by your bot has been reverted because it is a user page which was created and edited by its owner.[1] This is not vandalism per the rules on WP:USERPAGE. Please be careful! Cheers. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 02:05, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
It must have did that because of the title of it because its mostly used to User:Example/example. AndysCrogz1 (talk) 02:11, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Master AndysCrogz1 I have updated my definitions along with a custom AI addon. AndyzBot (talk) 02:16, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
unblock
[edit]- AndysCrogz1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 74.227.232.95 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "AndyzBot". The reason given for AndyzBot's block is: "unapproved bot/disruption".
Decline reason: One, you're not autoblocked. Two, it's extremely obvious sockpuppetry. — kurykh 03:20, 28 January 2009 (UTC)