User talk:Andyjoe7and8

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Andyjoe7and8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe I was probably blocked for two reasons. The first was because on one article, I frequently made changes. However, after the revisions were explained to me, I did stop making said changes, which was long before the block. The second reason is that I changed the listing of the article from "low" to "mid" priority. The admin. believes that this is an autobiography; which is not true. I simply did not agree with the reason why the listing was changed to "low" again (the editor simply said "not going to happen". I never meant to go into disruptive editing, and if you look at recent conversations, even though I may have had problems with one or two editors, I have tried to work out problems with other editors. Additionally, when the revisions were explained, I left them alone. I did not realize that changing a listing was grounds for disruptive editing, and I will not do so in the future.

Decline reason:

You show no understanding of many policies of Wikipedia, and have in the past willfully ignored any attempt to get you to do so. There is also concern that you have falsified or misrepresnted information as coming from a reliable source, when it did not. This is problematic and disruptive, and I agree with both Toddst1 and Chaser in the rationale for this block. Jayron32 04:40, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page privileges revoked

For edit warring on this page. Toddst1 (talk) 23:37, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Parascandola Event.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Parascandola Event.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:23, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Parascandola Event.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Parascandola Event.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:03, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]