User talk:AndySLord

Welcome!

Hello, AndySLord, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 00:54, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've twice redirected an article you created, because it's unacceptable in the form you've offered. It appeared to have been composed of original research, and depended entirely on other Wikipedia articles as sources, which is not allowed. I chose to redirect it to a logical current article, rather than propose it for deletion outright. Please read policies at WP:RELIABLE and WP:NOR. Thanks, and happy editing, 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 00:54, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, having another stab at it with some key references; slowly figuring out the markup ;)AndySLord (talk) 15:21, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 10)

{{subst:Afc decline|full=User:AndySLord/sandbox|cv=no|reason=reason|details=What is the subject of this draft meant to be?

This draft both lacks references (see [[WP:REFB|referencing for beginners), and lacks a proper lede sentence defining the scope of the article.|comment=|sig=yes}}

Hello! AndySLord, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:41, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural evolution sandbox

Hi Andy,

I hope you don't mind, but I've taken the liberty of moving your draft to Draft:Cultural evolution so we can work on it together there for a bit before submitting it to the article namespace. Joe Roe (talk) 13:36, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again AndySLord (talk) 14:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Developing Cultural Evolution page

I have the opportunity to develop the Cultural Evolution page as part of an assignment. What areas in particular do you think should be expanded upon? Is there anything in the page that should be added that isn't there already? ChristiannM (talk) 14:32, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks. There are quite a few of the sub-headings that could do with some fleshing out. We are looking for a brief paragraph or so on each and a link to the relevant main article. As you can see, quite a bit needs doing. Is your assignment mostly cultural evolution or mostly wiki-page editing (or both)? AndySLord (talk) 17:13, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It would be an assignment on developing the cultural evolution page, but I'm choosing between this and dual inheritance theory as my focus. There are others in my class, one of whom will almost certainly choose to develop this page. ChristiannM (talk) 19:42, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, that would be ideal if one of you were going to focus editing the DIT page, and presumably others were looking into other aspects such as memetics (out of curiosity what is the class and where?) Then I would suggest that "specialist" do a short paragraph entry for the CE wiki page with links to their own editing.

We get to choose what page we do as long as it's in the scope of psychology/cultural evolution, so the topic choices are broader than just this kind of thing. It's a psychology class at LSE. Would you know what to develop on the DIT page? ChristiannM (talk) 18:03, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting, LSE teaching CE. I do have some ideas you might want to think about regarding DIT and its relation to CE. PM me: from column on the left - Tools>Email this user.

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello AndySLord! Your additions to Cultural evolution have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pabsoluterince (talk) 09:10, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cultural evolution for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cultural evolution is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural evolution until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:59, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]