User talk:AndyAnders
Speedy deletion of Lisa Haley
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Lisa Haley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Madcoverboy (talk) 18:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Lisa Haley reply
[edit]Hi there Andy & welcome back. Lets clear up the "in your own words" question. For copyright reasons we cannot accept text which is copied verbatim from other sources. the only exception this is if the source is out of copyright or has been released to GFDL. So, any article must be written in your own words but must also be supported by references to reliable published sources. You might summarise the key points of someone's life in a few paragraphs but reference the facts therein to a published biography which might be of several hundred pages.
You will need to find more sources than the Overture Magazine article (it could be considered just a bit too local and remember that Wikiedpia requires "significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources" and you will need to inline cite them in the article too, but based on that & some other online sources I dug up the start of a Wikipedia article might look like this:
- Lisa Haley is an American Grammy nominated Cajun / Zydeco musician.[1] Although she was brought up in California, her family's roots are in Louisiana and Lisa is the fourth generation to play the fiddle.[2]...... etc etc
- References
- ^ "L.A. County Holiday Celebration". California Chronicle. 2008-11-07. Retrieved 2008-11-16.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ "Member Services CD Spotlight" (PDF). Professional Musicians, Local 47. 2008-11-01. Retrieved 2008-11-16.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help)
Notice how I have taken the facts from the sources but reworked them in my own words?
You need to emphasis the notability (e.g. the Grammy noms, the chart placings) and avoid mentioning that the album is available for purchase as that will just make the whole thing look like a vehicle for selling a few more copies. Would also suggest a quick flick through the notability requirements for musicians just to be on the safe side and to make sure you have included everything which is relevant.
Hope this helps & good luck! Nancy talk 17:13, 16 November 2008 (UTC)