Jump to content

User talk:Andrybak/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2

Minor "fixes" on my user page

Hi, I didn't notice until now the "fixes" you made last August on my user page. I'm wondering why you felt it important to do so. Thanks, YoPienso (talk) 04:15, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Yopienso, hi. In Special:Diff/1105706652 the main goal was the same as in an edit in August of 2019 – Special:Diff/910933298 – to remove incorrect categorization of the user page. The other changes are just wikitext cleanup. —⁠andrybak (talk) 08:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Neither of the two edits is marked as minor, for the record. —⁠andrybak (talk) 08:14, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for replying. I don't understand your reply, however. What does "remove incorrect categorization of the user page" mean? I don't see what needed fixing. I don't see how you improved the encyclopedia. Since I don't understand why you feel your changes were important, they look like minor, picky things. Yet you came back to inform me they weren't minor. ???
Was there something wrong with the userboxes I copied or modified or created? If so, what? If so, what harm was done by my user page? Frankly, I feel invaded. YoPienso (talk) 14:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Yopienso, just to make sure we're on the same page:
  1. Userboxes are a kind of template. In particular, userboxes are a kind of "user template".
  2. Templates can be categorized.
  3. Categorization is done using pages in the namespace "Category".
  4. Category:Alaska college and university user templates is for user templates about higher education in the state of Alaska, as the name suggests.
Your user page, i.e. the page User:Yopienso, is not a template. As such, it is incorrect for the page User:Yopienso to contain categorization into Category:Alaska college and university user templates or any other category not intended for user pages.
I hope the above answers your questions What does "remove incorrect categorization of the user page" mean? and Was there something wrong with the userboxes I copied or modified or created?. It is a common mistake for editors who copy-paste wikitext of user templates to select too much of the wikitext and paste incorrect categorization into their page.
I understand that it might be hard to see the removal of this categorization in Special:Diff/1105706652, because the edit also includes a lot of wikitext cleanup. Edit summary of my edit is "user page is not a template: removed Category:Alaska college and university user templates using HotCat, cleaned up wikitext" – the last part after the comma is about this cleanup. This wikitext cleanup was done semi-automatically to make the wikitext cleaner.
Since I don't understand why you feel your changes were important – I hope it is obvious that having correct categorization on all pages is important. Otherwise, the whole categorization system will be chaos.
they look like minor, picky things. Yet you came back to inform me they weren't minor. ??? – the phrase "minor edit" has a very specific meaning on English Wikipedia. In my message – Neither of the two edits is marked as minor, for the record. – I meant this technical, specific to Wikipedia, meaning of the word "minor".
As for Frankly, I feel invaded – correcting such errors on user pages of other editors is allowed by the guidelines.
For more details, please see the pages that I've linked. I'll gladly answer any questions if you have any. —⁠andrybak (talk) 20:38, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
I'm assuming the answer lies buried somewhere in this: "Your user page, i.e. the page User:Yopienso, is not a template. As such, it is incorrect for the page User:Yopienso to contain categorization into Category:Alaska college and university user templates or any other category not intended for user pages." I'm mildly interested in understanding how my page offended--not least to avoid making an error in the future--but your explanation doesn't tell me how. The history of the Category:Alaska college, etc. page doesn't show my name or use page ever having been there. I honestly don't understand at all why you felt obliged to edit my page. The diff shows you removing blank spaces. Way too picky, imo. Anyway, thank you, I guess, for saving us from chaos. YoPienso (talk) 13:58, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

I'm mildly interested in understanding how my page offended--not least to avoid making an error in the future--but your explanation doesn't tell me how.

Yopienso, it seems that you are not familiar with how categorization works in MediaWiki. Please consult the page Help:Category and Wikipedia:FAQ/Categorization.
To see the wikitext that was causing the issue on your userpage, please go to the page Special:Diff/1105706652, use the "Find on page" or similar functionality in your browser and search for Category:Alaska college and university user templates. First search result would be in my edit summary and in the second search result you will see the line where the incorrect categorization was removed.
To avoid such errors in the future, please pay closer attention to what kind of wikitext you are copying and which categories appear at the bottom of your userpage (see screenshot at Help:Categories).

The history of the Category:Alaska college, etc. page doesn't show my name or use page ever having been there.

Due to the way categorization is implemented, one cannot see the history of categorization on the page of the category. The problematic wikitext was in your userpage. It was introduced in your edit: Special:Diff/1097120261.

I honestly don't understand at all why you felt obliged to edit my page.

Because your userpage is not a template, as I mentioned in the edit summary of Special:Diff/1105706652. If you look at the top of the page Category:Alaska college and university user templates, you will see a banner with text: Templates relating to Alaska colleges and universities. The pages listed in this category are meant to be user templates, including userboxes. Your userpage does not belong in a category for templates. Examples of pages that don't belong in that category:
Examples of pages that do belong in that category:
Using appropriate categories on pages is one of the main principles of the guideline Wikipedia:Categorization. Editors who use the category system to search for userboxes about colleges and universities in Alaska would be surprised to find the page User:Yopienso in the Category:Alaska college and university user templates. —⁠andrybak (talk) 15:43, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Categorisation Barnstar
For your work on properly categorizing the templates on Wikipedia, something very little attention is often given to. Your work is noticed and appreciated greatly! Johnson524 (Talk!) 04:10, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello Andrybak, I hope you're doing well. I'm not sure if you like barnstars or not, but after seeing your amazing amount of recent categorization work, I felt it would only be right to show my appreciation in some way more than a simple 'thanks'. Thank you for all you do, cheers! Johnson524 (Talk!) 04:10, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Muisca people

A tag has been placed on Category:Muisca people indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 19:15, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Template Barnstar
For all the great work you do on templates. DB1729talk 11:35, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

misplaced

Do you have a good and or easy point of reference as to misplaced template project tags? it would be very helpful if you could. Thanks. JarrahTree 01:01, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

JarrahTree, for Template:WikiProject Templates the answer is very simple: the point of reference is its documentation, which includes a big warning sign with the text This template should almost never be used on the talk pages of templates. (emphasis in the original). If you look at the transclusion of {{WikiProject Templates}} at Special:Permalink/1162335057 and click on [show], you will see that the template produces a big red warning This template should only be transcluded in the Wikipedia talk, Help talk, or Category talk namespace(s). This warning also shows up if you preview an edit with the template before publishing it. —⁠andrybak (talk) 07:19, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Ok thanks for the explanation - from at least one point of view - the notion that a template talk page excludes a project tag seems counter-intuitive - so in a way of speaking templates dont have their own project tag? However If I read you right, where a category talk page has it, it's ok?
The whole experience of project tagging on talk pages is and has been quite an experience at times, this adds yet another layer to the over all intrigue. Thanks for the reply. JarrahTree 08:46, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
the whole thing is due to the commencement of the australian transport project - which involved seeking out and checking transport related topics of oz - in some cases the many templates used in transport material failed to have state/topic tag added - and thats how it started - the project has scratched the surface of the larger range of eligible candidates for the transport tagging so far... JarrahTree 08:50, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
JarrahTree, all templates are by definition in the scope of WikiProject Templates. For more elaboration on the topic, see this TfD discussion from 2010. —⁠andrybak (talk) 09:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
That is a very good link and well gone through at that point - thanks for the info... JarrahTree 09:24, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Up-arrow/doc

Template:Up-arrow/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rjjiii (talk) 05:58, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia navigational boxes

Sir, your edits broke categorization on subpages. I’ve fixed 3 of them. I.e. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AWikipedias_in_Uralic_languages&diff=1177692883&oldid=1141571067 Joseph (talk) 07:16, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Joseph. Thank you for messaging me about this issue.
Categorizing articles using templates like this is discouraged. Mainly because it leads too easily to miscategorization. Such indirection in categorization also makes it harder for editors (and bots) to track down the categorizations, when they need to be adjusted (due to category renaming, merging, deletion, etc).
Using explicit categorization is recommended instead. This is documented in the guidelines at Wikipedia:Categorization#Categorization using templates. —⁠andrybak (talk) 12:29, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Ok, let's migrate all catégories, then remove this from template. Otherwise these catégories would be deleted being empty. Joseph (talk) 12:33, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Joseph,  Done for all 10 subcategories of Category:Wikipedias by language. —⁠andrybak (talk) 13:47, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:34, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Television series by genre fan user templates

A tag has been placed on Category:Television series by genre fan user templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 21:18, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2023 Rugby World Cup pool stage key

Template:2023 Rugby World Cup pool stage key has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 18:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

"participant of" is suboptimal grammar

As I have been cleaning up userboxes, I have noticed a few edits like this one, in which you changed "member of" to "participant of". The phrasing "participant in" makes more sense. Also, in that edit, you did not change the actual category, which is the point of the CFD. I don't think that the CFD contained any consensus about the wording used by individual WikiProjects to describe their members/participants/flunkies, so I have been leaving that wording for WikiProjects to decide for themselves, or for an RFC. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:39, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Jonesey95, thank you for the correction. Feel free to revert the offending edits. —⁠andrybak (talk) 00:33, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Andrybak!

Happy New Year!

Andrybak,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 13:58, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 13:58, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Category good sense

Ah, I was wondering for a while how I would go add categories in a Sandbox type of environment, like you did at User:Qwertyxp2000/Template:Auckland, New Zealand, but now that you stated the colons behind the category stuff, that makes a lot of sense. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 19:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

@Qwertyxp2000, check out WP:COLONTRICK. —⁠andrybak (talk) 19:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I have seen this colon trick before, but hadn't known that I could do this in the context of sandboxed templates. Thanks for letting me know that page. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

RFA2024 update: no longer accepting new proposals in phase I

Hey there! This is to let you know that phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship (RfA) review is now no longer accepting new proposals. Lots of proposals remain open for discussion, and the current round of review looks to be on a good track towards making significant progress towards improving RfA's structure and environment. I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who has given us their idea for change to make RfA better, and the same to everyone who has given the necessary feedback to improve those ideas. The following proposals remain open for discussion:

  • Proposal 2, initiated by HouseBlaster, provides for the addition of a text box at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship reminding all editors of our policies and enforcement mechanisms around decorum.
  • Proposals 3 and 3b, initiated by Barkeep49 and Usedtobecool, respectively, provide for trials of discussion-only periods at RfA. The first would add three extra discussion-only days to the beginning, while the second would convert the first two days to discussion-only.
  • Proposal 5, initiated by SilkTork, provides for a trial of RfAs without threaded discussion in the voting sections.
  • Proposals 6c and 6d, initiated by BilledMammal, provide for allowing users to be selected as provisional admins for a limited time through various concrete selection criteria and smaller-scale vetting.
  • Proposal 7, initiated by Lee Vilenski, provides for the "General discussion" section being broken up with section headings.
  • Proposal 9b, initiated by Reaper Eternal, provides for the requirement that allegations of policy violation be substantiated with appropriate links to where the alleged misconduct occured.
  • Proposals 12c, 21, and 21b, initiated by City of Silver, Ritchie333, and HouseBlaster, respectively, provide for reducing the discretionary zone, which currently extends from 65% to 75%. The first would reduce it 65%–70%, the second would reduce it to 50%–66%, and the third would reduce it to 60%–70%.
  • Proposal 13, initiated by Novem Lingaue, provides for periodic, privately balloted admin elections.
  • Proposal 14, initiated by Kusma, provides for the creation of some minimum suffrage requirements to cast a vote.
  • Proposals 16 and 16c, initiated by Thebiguglyalien and Soni, respectively, provide for community-based admin desysop procedures. 16 would desysop where consensus is established in favor at the administrators' noticeboard; 16c would allow a petition to force reconfirmation.
  • Proposal 16e, initiated by BilledMammal, would extend the recall procedures of 16 to bureaucrats.
  • Proposal 17, initiated by SchroCat, provides for "on-call" admins and 'crats to monitor RfAs for decorum.
  • Proposal 18, initiated by theleekycauldron, provides for lowering the RfB target from 85% to 75%.
  • Proposal 24, initiated by SportingFlyer, provides for a more robust alternate version of the optional candidate poll.
  • Proposal 25, initiated by Femke, provides for the requirement that nominees be extended-confirmed in addition to their nominators.
  • Proposal 27, initiated by WereSpielChequers, provides for the creation of a training course for admin hopefuls, as well as periodic retraining to keep admins from drifting out of sync with community norms.
  • Proposal 28, initiated by HouseBlaster, tightens restrictions on multi-part questions.

To read proposals that were closed as unsuccessful, please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I/Closed proposals. You are cordially invited once again to participate in the open discussions; when phase I ends, phase II will review the outcomes of trial proposals and refine the implementation details of other proposals. Another notification will be sent out when this phase begins, likely with the first successful close of a major proposal. Happy editing! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her), via:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Cats

Should I be moving the cats to the doc pages when Im making them? I still have hundreds of pages left to create. Noah, AATalk 23:39, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Hurricane Noah, yes. Please see the guideline Wikipedia:Categorization#Template categorization for details and syntax. Additional information is covered by Wikipedia:Template documentation#How to create a documentation subpage and Template:Documentation/doc.
Please avoid putting templates into content categories, as per this RfC. —⁠andrybak (talk) 23:43, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Hurricane Noah, since the text of the documentation is the same on all the templates in Category:Pacific typhoon season button templates, you might want to consider creating a dedicated template for the documentation. See examples in Category:Documentation shared content templates. —⁠andrybak (talk) 00:03, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Did I do this correctly for templates in Category:South_Pacific_cyclone_season_buttons? Noah, AATalk 00:53, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Hurricane Noah, look good to me. Thank you for working on documenting these templates. —⁠andrybak (talk) 01:02, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Minor simplification is possible in your approach: the subpage /doc is not needed if the whole documentation is done with a single template. Example: Special:Diff/1214112762. —⁠andrybak (talk) 01:05, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

RFA2024 update: phase I concluded, phase II begins

Hi there! Phase I of the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus:

See the project page for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II. theleekycauldron (talk), via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:08, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Category:Film templates parameter issues has been nominated for splitting

Category:Film templates parameter issues has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 22:48, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Andrybak/Archive_2&oldid=1255027783"