User talk:Android7400

March 2020

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Line 5 Eglinton has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 00:32, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pearson Regional Transit Centre (May 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SpicyMilkBoy was:

Thanks for your submission. This will be notable once it is built, but right now, it's too soon for this transit centre to have an article. Many things can happen between now and 2030 and it's not certain that this will even exist at any time in the near future (just think of all the projects that have been put on hold due to COVID-19) or, if it does, whether it will exist in the format described here. See the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation#Draft:Pearson_Regional_Transit_Centre.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pearson Regional Transit Centre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pearson Regional Transit Centre, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 21:02, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Android7400! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 21:02, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Android7400 (talk) 00:58, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Apologies for the draft. Im really passionate about transit and I think this project is the one I want to see most completed. But yeah I agree it's soon. I might keep the draft so I can remake it once there's more info in the far future and hopefully get it approved but for now that's it.

No problem, it's quite a good draft really, it's just a quirk of our policies that we don't accept articles on proposed projects... drafts are automatically deleted after 6 months if no one is actively working on them, but you can always request for it to be restored at WP:REFUND. :) SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 01:03, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm Magnolia677. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, East York, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. On Wikipedia you can't just write about "stuff you know" like the transit system in your particular neighbourhood; text needs to be encyclopedic and sourced. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:56, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pearson Regional Transit Centre

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zanimum (talk) 15:35, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Finch–Kennedy GO Station

Hello Android7400,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Finch–Kennedy GO Station for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 20:27, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]