User talk:Andrewgprout/Archive 6

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

hyderabad airport

hi.....Ive checked the source attached by that IP ...it's a PDF....it clearly has all the start dates and end dates Adithya003 (talk) 07:13, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

hi....i want you to check the edits done by me on rajiv gandhi international airport....now i've attached a source which says the flight is bookable in october 2022...thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:201:C001:D0A0:6175:D01E:89A7:F208 (talk) 09:11, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

hi again...i request you to interfere in this matter...the user called random haste is reverting my edits without listening to me this article Rajiv Gandhi International Airport — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:201:C001:D0A0:6175:D01E:89A7:F208 (talk) 09:21, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

hey please check this user Random Haste...he is going on reverting my edits in this article Rajiv Gandhi International Airport — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:201:C001:D0A0:6175:D01E:89A7:F208 (talk) 10:40, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

I hope you understand that the user 2405:201:C001:D0A0:6175:D01E:89A7:F208 (talk) is adding Content which can easily be considered as Vandalism. I am hoping that you atleast make him understand not to add Vandalism content. And if you retain with him, i don't have anything to say, other than that you are supporting the vandalism content. Thankyou.Random Haste (talk) 10:49, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Check if this is consider

Hello! Hope I'm not disturbing you, but one of the page which is Dublin Airport is seemingly edited that some user is always removing the failed verification etc. Since Aer Lingus will resume New York and Orlando, I found this link [1] which is verified (idk if this is consider). Could check it and see if I can add it? Thanks for your response! Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 05:20, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Cornerstone2.0 yup that is to my mind an acceptable reference for the detail it is intented to support - I don't know if the actual destination detail was ever actually removed, if it had always been there I personally would not bother adding a resume date, although a reference can always be added. Remember Wikipedia is not ment to be a directory and there is no obligation that every possible fact is included here. In fact quite the opposite is true when trying to keep pages focussed on being encyclopaedic. Andrewgprout (talk) 01:15, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Stfu Trainsspotter4life (talk) 08:42, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

You have twice reverted an edit at British Airways Flight 009 changing the flight call sign from all capitals to a mix of upper and lower case. Consistency both within articles and over multiple articles is a cornerstone of Wikipedia editing. The IP editor is quite correct when he or she points out that all other articles where a call sign is given are solely in upper case (as this is the industry convention). This has been the established consensus here for many years and your changes fly in the face of that consensus.

Your assertion that the IP instigated the change and should obtain consensus is incorrect. The IP (correctly) reverted an edit by User:Evanl589 who changed the established upper case to mixed case, so it is not the IP’s responsibility to obtain the consensus but either you or Evanl589 must do so as outlined in the next paragraph.

If you believe that there is a valid case for changing that consensus then it is your responsibility to obtain the necessary consensus via a ‘Request for Comment’ (RfC) to change the established upper case convention in ‘’every’’ aircraft related article. I have no idea where you raise such an RfC, and am not about to do the work for you. I would venture my opinion that you would be wasting your time as every plane spotter and enthusiast would weigh in against you. Meanwhile: changing to lower case in any one article is disruptive editing which could, potentially, land you with a block for Clearly not being here to ‘’collaboratively’’ build an encyclopedia.

Also: multiple reverts are edit warring (also block-able) and I am procedurally obliged to make you aware of the three revert rule as this a pre-requisite of raising an edit warring case. I note that you are not a newcomer to controversial edit wars. Vuehalloo (talk) 18:08, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

@Vuehalloo: I actually only reverted once here and that revert was to the esablished version so it is your edit that is questionable. Please be more careful in your accusations. In this case the established consensus and history was that the lowercase version was appropriate. The restrictions of 1950s teleprinters should not still be affecting content and the readability of Wikipedia in 2021. Andrewgprout (talk) 20:36, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Please do not misrepresent the situation. That just makes you a liar (or if not then someone just too lazy to check).

I grant that you made one revert. However, you did not revert to the established version as you claim. The edit that added the callsign added it in all capitals where it remained until Evanl589 came along. All capitals is the established consensus across many articles going back at least three years (including “SPEEDBIRD”). I found no articles whatsoever with mixed case in my search. Thus it is yourself and Evanl589 that made the questionable edits (against established consensus). As I said: if you have a problem with your ability to read Wikipedia, then raise an RfC. Vuehalloo (talk) 14:35, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Editorial Note

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Saudia Flight 163. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

• Comment Please refrain from making pointless reverts for minor edits to avoid possible confusion. United Airlines Flight 175. Username006 (talk) 11:01, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Inappropriate edit summary

While looking at the edit history of Saudia Flight 163 I saw your edit summary "Reverted 1 edit by Username006 (talk): Wtf are you doing here" -- I see you and others have long running issues with that user but using this language is unacceptable, especially for a good-faith (albeit misguided) edit. I'm not here to discuss, I just need to speak up because it bothers me seeing attacks like this. Take care Strangerpete (talk) 12:20, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Kea not only alpine parrot as mountain parakeets also reside in Puna grasslands that are alpine zone of the Andes

Mountain Parakeets are found in the Puna Grasslands.

The Puna Grasslands are the alpine region of the Andes, located above treeline.

The puna is found above the treeline at 3200–3500 m elevation, and below the permanent snow line above 4500–5000 m elevation. It extends from central Peru in the north, across the Altiplano plateau of Peru, Chile and Bolivia, and south along the spine of the Andes into northwest Argentina.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puna_grassland

The Andes Mountains of South America are the longest mountain range in the world. In the high elevation areas these mountains are a complex series of alpine ecosystems. The two Andean regions classified as alpine are the Paramos and Puna.

https://wrangle.org/ecoregion/south-america/tundra-alpine

The mountain parakeet (Psilopsiagon aurifrons), also known as the golden-fronted parakeet, is a species of parrot, one of two in the genus Psilopsiagon within the family Psittacidae. It is found in the Puna grassland. Its natural habitat is subtropical or tropical high-altitude shrubland. Four subspecies are recognized.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_parakeet

The mountain parakeet is found in the Andes at altitudes between 1,000 and 4,500 meters (3,300 and 14,800 ft). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.38.52.98 (talk) 08:37, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Username006 (talk) 04:37, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Frankfurt Airport

Hi. Before reverting an edit, could you at least check the correct information, please. Especially considering a link to the schedule is provided on the page so it's easy enough. You would have seen that neither Nice nor New York JFK are operating right now, and neither are bookable beyond 1 November. I think we can both agree that's seasonal, not year round. ProjectLauren (talk) 18:59, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

@ProjectLauren: it is the responsibility of the person adding or changing detail to properly reference such detail as per WP:BURDEN. Please make sure you do so. Andrewgprout (talk) 01:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

SPI??

Are you going on with the SPI against Eitilth Nua (New Flights in translation)? Account created the day after EireAviation was blocked as sockpuppet. See this one: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jack1985IE/Archive. The Banner talk 11:42, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

His disruptive behaviour starts to look more and more like EA. The Banner talk 08:37, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Nashville airport

I tried to find the reference the only reference I seen and found. cannot be shared due to Wikipedias policy Wjacob29 (talk) 07:41, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Short description

See this section for more information. That said, if you've got a better idea for a short description I don't have any objections. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 19:48, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Edinburgh Airport

It said on Swiss air website that they fly from Edinburgh direct to Zurich 2A02:C7E:1804:8F00:ACCD:DF8:A787:FA4A (talk) 10:08, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Regarding IXC edit

You reverted my edit stating if summary is correct that destination shouldn’t be here … what does that mean ?? There is no change in aircraft, flight number nor passenger need to disembark - this is direct route via DEL- and even Vistara mentions the same. 649pardeep (talk) 00:13, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

I don’t what else you need even I have provided enough proof but still you’re reverting. Please discuss here. 649pardeep (talk) 06:31, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warning discussion page

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 649pardeep (talk) 06:58, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Reverted edit on Doha Airport page

Hello,

I've seen you have reverted the edit about KLM returning to Doha. I do see your point of view, but why would we delete it if it only adds information to the page? It doesn't disturb anyone, the information is right (including the source) and tickets can be booked via KLM and other websites so it is worthy of being in the table. It is temporarily, but since it will start and end more than half a year from now on, there is no reason not to put it down.

Please let me know if we can find a compromise, and if we decide to put it out, don't forget to delete it on the EHAM page as well. For now I will turn it back. RudolfN23 (talk) 11:31, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

@Andrewpgrout and @RudolfN23: Brought up the discussion at WT:AIRPORTS (added Lufthansa too since it will operate flights there as well). Please discuss there. Thanks! 97.82.30.107 (talk) 16:23, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Dublin Airport

Good to see no more Nonsense. All that 'edit warring' was getting beyond pathetic. Trainsspotter4life (talk) 16:29, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

@Trainsspotter4life: That is mostly because the disruptive editors have all been blocked. And in the case of their reincarnation being very careful to behave and actually be encyclopaedic. Andrewgprout (talk) 17:39, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Dublin Airport & Aeroflot

Can you prove that the flights of Aeroflot are still active? You seem to suggest that with your edits there. And please, do not edit war over it. The Banner talk 08:01, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Hello, I'm The Banner. Your recent edit(s) to the page Dublin Airport appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Banner talk 11:58, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

24.106.149.122

Hey, This user has a habit of removing references for services that are active saying that they are not required. Can you take a look, I reverted him back but undid my own edit. I advise him/her to bring it to discussion at WT:AIRPORTS if they have any issues. Thanks! 97.82.30.107 (talk) 00:49, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

For your interest

This might interest you: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jack1985IE. Note: you are not part of the investigation. The Banner talk 16:56, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Bus Routes

If your going to delete the bus routes from Dublin Bus then you'd better delete the ones on Go Ahead Ireland and London Buses. Trainsspotter4life (talk) 01:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

@Trainsspotter4life: (what is it with the two s’s?) If you knew the difference between your and you’re I might take you more seriously. A random list of unreferenced detail is not encyclopaedic. Wikipedia is not a directory nor is it a travel guide. Andrewgprout (talk) 03:36, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Then delete the list of bus routes for Go Ahead Ireland then. If your say Wikipedia's not a travel guide then delete Go Aheads routes 🤷 Trainsspotter4life (talk) 05:54, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

you* Trainsspotter4life (talk) 05:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

All I'm saying is if Wikipedia is only an encyclopedia than why should other bus company pages have route information? If you're going to remove my edit from Dublin Bus on routes then you should also remove route information from other bus company pages otherwise it's unfair. Trainsspotter4life (talk) 15:25, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Ok. Should I go and delete bus route information from other pages? Trainsspotter4life (talk) 19:52, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Answer me please. Trainsspotter4life (talk) 17:29, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Also what made you randomly attack me? This deletion came out of nowhere. Trainsspotter4life (talk) 19:07, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

You should delete Go Ahead Irelands bus route list since you're saying Wikipedia is only an encyclopedia. Otherwise it's unfair. Trainsspotter4life (talk) 19:08, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Still don't have the decency to answer me. Trainsspotter4life (talk) 03:08, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

I do not see where Andrew have to answer on. Secondly, it looks like Andrew is on a break. Thirdly: WP:STICK. Merry Christmas to all of you.. The Banner talk 08:43, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

RfC on the "Airlines and destinations" tables in airport articles

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) § RfC on the "Airlines and destinations" tables in airport articles. I saw that you participated in a previous discussion on this topic. Sunnya343 (talk) 17:40, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Adventures of Massey Ferguson

The article The Adventures of Massey Ferguson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 11:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC)