User talk:Andrewconnell

NCIS:LA

Hey there, where was it stated that Barrett Foa was going to again be a series regular on NCIS: LA? Last I'd seen, he had opted out of starring in the regular series. Cheers! — Huntster (t • @ • c) 23:59, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto the above comment - do you have a source that states otherwise? _{El Greco}^(talk) 00:22, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually Greco, what's our source that says he isn't? Didn't notice one. :/ — Huntster (t • @ • c) 00:32, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, exactly. Where is the source saying he isn't doing it? You shouldn't automatically assume he isn't doing it, because there is nothing to say he has quit/left. I actually e-mailed the webmaster of his official website. He replied and told me Barrett would be in the show as a recurring guest star. He also said he didn't know how many episodes or when. _{User:Andrewconnell} 10:45, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Kensi, I really have no preference. I'd seen multiple sources call her "Lo", but if the official site says "Blye", lets find a source that supports that and run with it (citing the official site as well, of course; this looks like a decent source). Interestingly, while "Kensi Lo" has just over 1,100 hits in a regular Google search and "Kensi Blye" has around 1,400, in a Google News search Lo has 15 hits and Blye has 2, mostly foreign. Kinda odd. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 03:22, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good research. We'll have to wait until the season premieres or other official sources confirm to us that it is Blye, or indeed, Lo. --Andrewconnell (talk) 18:27, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, now that the show is on air, I am proud to announce that I was correct: Kensi Blye it is

Added some new information for you to include on the talk page for actor Adam Jamal Craig on NCIS:LA - I'll leave the fun work of citations, etc for you to do. I grew up with him (which why I know what I know and shouldn't be the one to edit the page) and might be able to help a tiny amount (can't say he was a nice guy or that I was friends with him so I don't know everything about him.) Bandlero (talk) 09:40, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adam Jamal Craig

The article Adam Jamal Craig has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sub-stub, non-notable actor with only a couple of small roles.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Primefac (talk) 17:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Adam Jamal Craig

Hello Andrewconnell, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Adam Jamal Craig, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Jamal Craig.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chris troutman}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chris Troutman (talk) 19:16, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]