User talk:Andrewpmk/Archive 4

Archives: /Archive 1 /Archive 2 /Archive 3

Substitution

I was doing some cleanup and found a transclusion of yours. I've sure you're aware, so I won't use the {{subst:subst}} template. Cheers,
brenneman ^(t)^(c) 02:09, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uel

I've moved this entry to a new article, List of minor Biblical figures. I hope this outcome is satisfactory to you, as it preserves the information, which is not likely to be expanded upon. Cheers! BD2412 ^talk 00:45, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Kalamaki

Andrew

I have created a disambiguation page for a couple of Greek places as well as the dish which is an alternative name for Souvlaki. I have also created a stub for the resort. There are other links on what links here relating to a Greek place but I am uncertain of where. I have outlined a strategy on the talk page for sorting out the problem.

I would be grateful if you could have a look at the disambiguation page and the stub on Kalamaki (Zakynthos).

Capitalistroadster 10:51, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My Welcome Message

Thank you very much for making that correction in my welcome message! I didn't even notice it until now. Ac e tic '^Acid 06:30, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

confused

How come I am not allowed to delete my old comments? It's not like it's completely gone. It's all in my history if you want to see the comments. (Jessica Liao 20:47, 26 October 2005 (UTC))[reply]

I did not know that but thank you for telling me about it. (Jessica Liao 20:56, 26 October 2005 (UTC))[reply]

Your criticism

You criticised editing by someone at 165.228.129.12

Please keep in mind that "Such an IP address can be shared by several users". If you have a complaint, it might be wise to indicate which article you are complaining about, so there is some relevance to your comment.

No need to delete

If you read, you'd see that the Karai article is on the 2003 TMNT series.

DaGreatSaiyajin 03:13, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nose/Bone

Some people get their bone pierced.

Personal attack

You gave no reason for deleting my List page and did not address my concerns in the talk page as dictated by Wikipedia policy. Please explain. Or I will walk over from next door at Goodes Hall of Queen's University, on the same block as KC, and punch you in the nose. If you go eat at Mack-Corry or JDUC cafeterias like all other useless KC students I will also punch you in the nose at those locations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.15.82.217 (talk • contribs)

Reverting vandalism by 168.8.230.251

Hi, I was trying to clean up a trail left by above IP but somebody had already done it in this article and I reverted to an out-of-date version. Apologies! Dlyons493 Talk 02:11, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Test tags

Hey, I just wanted to let you know that you don't have to manually add the "This message is regarding the page" when warning a vandal. You can use the test-n templates, all the test templates have corresponding test-n templates. Example: {{test4-n|George W. Bush}}. Just letting you know, it's a timesaver. -Greg Asche (talk) 23:28, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Actrise Article

Hi. I saw your comment on my talk page. Did you enjoy the Actrise article or were you just reviewing it? Guermantes 21:35, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

List of Marvel Comics characters

I recently reverted apparent vandalism on the List of Marvel Comics characters, restoring wikilinks and headers that had been removed from the A, B, and C characters only. My comment reads "rv removal of subheaders/wikilinks". Almost immediately afterward, you reverted my revert as vandalism. Was this an error? If not, you surely owe me an explanation. -- SCZenz 19:19, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it was a mistake. I have a habit of reverting edits which appear to remove content, but sometimes they are not vandalism. Andrew_pmk | Talk 19:26, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, my edit added back content, and my edit summary stated this clearly. I guess the confusion must've arose because the diff page looks so confusing...? At any rate, I'd ask you to be more careful—I've never been rvv'd before in 2000+ edits, and this seemed to be an odd time to start. -- SCZenz 19:59, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]