User talk:Andrew massyn

Thank you for your response, I was incorrect. If I were you, I'd include what you just told me in the article, as it lists SA as a same sex marriage country. You obviously know much about this, so you'd be a good one to bring the article up to date. Thanks for your response. Czolgolz 20:57, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Capetown, South Africa

Andrew, Thanks for your note. The idea was to get a photograph of a British style pillar box that is unquestionably located outside the UK. I know that these did exist in Capetown in the 1980's. A photograph of one of these close up would not necessarily prove that it wasn't just taken in Birmingham or Manchester. The idea is to have the photograph, such that it is close enough to show the details of the royal cypher, while at the same time having indications in the background that clearly identify the location as being Capetown, South Africa. Table Mountain in the background would make an excellent backdrop for the purposes, but it doesn't necessarily have to be Table Mountain. I took one in Penang, Malaysia about 11 years ago, but unfortunately it was located in a street, such that the best that I could do was to get some Bahasa Malaysia writing on the wall behind, into the picture, to show that it wasn't in Birmingham or Manchester.

Such a picture would be useful on some of the wikipedia post box articles. David Tombe (talk) 09:04, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Moraea collina

A tag has been placed on Moraea collina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Derild 49 21 ☼ 16:19, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You were a little too speedy.

Changing a redirect to a new article

This is quite easily accomplished. Click on the link that appears at the top of the destination page (Dietes iridioides in this case) when you are redirected away from your intended target (Moraea vegeta), and you will be taken back to the target. You can then edit the target. Remove the preexisting text (the redirect). I suggest that you make certain that your first edit is more substantial than just a photo. Otherwise, as you have already noticed, a zealous editor might delete your work. -- ☑ SamuelWantman 20:49, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Message from departing user: Post box Cape Town

David Tombe is departing Wikipedia permanently and asked me to delete his user and user talk pages. Accordingly, I'm moving a recent discussion from there to here. As he will not be editing Wikipedia in the future, I recommend that further discussion take place via email, thanks!--Jimbo Wales (talk) 17:02, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear David, some time ago I said I would get you an identifiable postbox with the royal cipher and the background of Cape Town. Here it is. Apologies for the delay. I have also included one with a notice on the box saying this is the property of the SA post office. The cypher is not as clear, but it is still identifiable. Kind regards Andrew massyn (talk) 17:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrew, Thanks very much for supplying these excellent pictures. They should undoubtedly find good use on a number of main wikipedia articles. You got the idea perfectly. By getting Table Mountain into the background, it leaves no doubt about the fact that the location is South Africa and not Manchester. And all the more interesting because you got a Queen Victoria one.

Out of curiosity, which approximate part of Cape Town is this pillar box located in? Is it somewhere like Rondebosch? David Tombe (talk) 12:54, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi it is in the suburb of Oranjezicht which is near the city centre. I am only aware of two Victorian post boxes currently in use in South Africa, although there are several for George V and George VI. None as far as I know for Elizabeth's reign. I have also posted a pic on wikimedia of the oldest post office stone in South Africa, which can be found here at Category:Post boxes in South Africa on wikemedia. Rgds Andrew massyn (talk) 21:03, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that you broke a citation and added material without a valid citation, possibly in violation of copyright rules, at International reactions to the 2011 Libyan uprising with this edit. This has been fixed, but please be more careful in the future. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 17:39, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to International reactions to the 2011 Libyan uprising has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. I have refactored the information you added so that it is not a verbatim copy of the news article, but please do not cut-and-paste information from news articles again. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 15:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]