User talk:AndrewWillis111
I have some concerns regarding copying and pasting in your edits, and issues of neutrality. Here is an example:
"This balance is ensured by law, certification standards, and our internal policies."
The previous statement is from http://www.islandtimberlands.com/sustainability/overview.htm and also violates neutrality by using the phrase "our internal policies"
If you persist in disobeying the policies of wikipedia, someone will likely report your conduct. Please respect the objectives of this wiki community.
Sincerely, Webmayin (talk) 03:59, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
September 2012
[edit]Hello, I'm Gold Standard. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Brookfield Asset Management without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. The removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gold Standard 04:39, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
I noticed that despite previous warnings of posting pasted content and violating neutrality, you have persisted in vandalising legitimate content. Wikipedia's policies on editing content are available here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines
The few pages that you edit are not your personal webspace, and you need to respond to allegations of violation, or your account will likely be terminated by an administrator. Webmayin (talk) 06:06, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello, This is a message of Webmayin. A single sentence was editied out of the Brookfield Asset Management citation. The sentence referred to a brief protest at a British Columbia-based company called Island Timberlands, an incident that has no relevence for Brookfield, a part owner of Island Timberlands. This edit was made because the reference was not in line with the neutral editorial goal of Wikipedia. Sincerely, AndrewWillis111
It is possible that the protest of Island Timberlands is not related content to Brookfield Assets Management, but given that the Occupy movement is so related to BAM, and that the protest was in solidarity with the occupy movement, it is at least somewhat related. Perhaps one of the wikipedia administrators could be contacted to make judgement on the issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webmayin (talk • contribs) 08:41, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
September 2012
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Brookfield Asset Management was changed by AndrewWillis111 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850261 on 2012-09-10T18:12:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:12, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
AN/I Discussion
[edit]Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Singlemaltscotch (talk) 21:52, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of AndyWillis111 (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |