User talk:Andrei George

Welcome!

Hello, Andrei George, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! `'mikka (t) 17:51, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

What is this about? What are your concerns with the article, and why do you feel you need to revert valuable contributions? Dahn 15:34, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss your changes in atrticle talk pages first. These articles went long ways of heated discussions to reach a state that satisfies various parties. `'mikka (t) 17:51, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

#RR

Please report 3rr violations to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR Mike _{(T C)} 19:45, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:3RR

The page in question has now been protected by another administrator. I agree with that admin's comments at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/3RR#User:Irpen. -- No Guru 19:46, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be more impressed if you had done more content creation and less reverting and wiki lawyering. Although unfortunately you are right and it does seem that certain factions have more power then others (or at least are more lucky). Life is though, and get a WP:TEA if you feel it's not fair. It'll pass.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 22:24, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ViennaAwards.GIF

You tagged the above image for speedy deletion. The image does not qualify for speedy deletion; please consider taking it to WP:IFD. Regards, Proto||type 20:20, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uprising of Khotin

Hi Andrei George! It's true that in the Uprising of Khotin case, User:Irpen did act without too much consideration when continually reverting your addition of the tag. However, it is clear from his edit summary that he did act in good faith and genuinely tried to solve the dispute by adding references and the like. In any case, technically he did not breach 3RR because he only reverted each of his versions twice. The first two times, he added references, which you reverted, and then he reverted again. That's two reverts. Later, after you added the tag again, he reverted to a tag-less version, which was a different version to the initial one before this dispute. A more detailed explanation of the technicalities was offered at WP:ANI, where you made the complaint. In any case, it would've been helpful if you had justified your addition of the tag more clearly. Hopefully a resolution can be reached on this matter. Thanks, Ronline ✉ 10:24, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What?

"That line of yours is kind of annoying can you delete it when you post?"

What you talking about? PANONIAN (talk) 16:08, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I like the lines. In fact purpose of the lines is that it mark where my posts on the talk pages begins and ends, practical thing... PANONIAN (talk) 16:20, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Romanians

Salut si cand ai timp nu te mai uiti pe articolul Romanians? Eu am prezentat ceva surse acolo si eu cred ca sunt peste 12,000,000 romani in afara. Tu ce surse ai? --Bombonel 20:47, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Name

Because I don't like what's going on there. Dmaftei 14:24, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the offer, but there's nothing you can do. Dmaftei 17:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Geografia României. Dmaftei 20:05, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Un "mail"?! Dacă te referi la adresă de e-mail, am mai multe; de ce întrebi? Dmaftei 20:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here you go: dmaftei at maftei dot net Dmaftei 20:24, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Picture related to Vienna arbitration

Last I looked, you had given no indication what you consider wrong with the picture.

If you are trying to get an image deleted, the usual route would be WP:IFD. Given that the image is being used in multiple articles, though, and that there don't appear to be any rights problems with it, you would clearly have to make a case for what is wrong with it. - Jmabel | Talk 21:07, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Sir Mabel. I posted earlier on WP:IFD as suggestion given from the Admins/Noticeboard.

--Andrei George 21:11, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]