User talk:AndreasKQ
|
My talk page
[edit]Jeez. Don't do that again. RahadyanS 22:05, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Apologies (embarrassed look) AndreasKQ 02:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Why was the section on JF Burns deleted? As far as I understand, every comment that is properly referenced should not be deleted? - WestTruth
- I didn't delete it. So I have no idea. AndreasKQ 12:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, I see now why you asked me. I'd originally moved down your additions to a Controversies and Criticisms section. But that's all I did. AndreasKQ 12:29, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
removing talk page headers
[edit]A friend told me earlier today that tph is unnecessary in most cases, so I've removed it from articles that haven't generated any controversy or other issues on their talk pages. AndreasKQ 03:53, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
old magazine/newspaper clippings
[edit]Hello, I noticed your interesting categorization edits recently. Were you at one point a reader of Talk magazine? If you are, then you could help me out. It would be a bit of work, but you could go back through the old issues of Talk and help complete one of the sections in List of the writings of William Monahan. That would really be a great help to me. I don't know if Monahan had a two dozen, half a dozen, or just the one article at Talk. Every little edit you could make to the list would help.-BillDeanCarter 19:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- I was a reader of Talk (magazine) but unfortunately all of my issues are in storage and currently unavailable. I don't know if an online archive of the issues exists. If I find out one does, I will let you know. AndreasKQ 20:00, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks. I figure it will take about a year to pull together a complete list of Monahan's writings. do you remember if it was just the one article in the first issue of Talk that was by Monahan, or if he was a frequent contributor?-BillDeanCarter 21:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- I really don't remember at all. I generally don't remember bylines that well. AndreasKQ 14:39, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks. I figure it will take about a year to pull together a complete list of Monahan's writings. do you remember if it was just the one article in the first issue of Talk that was by Monahan, or if he was a frequent contributor?-BillDeanCarter 21:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
George Gustines
[edit]A tag has been placed on George Gustines, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. exolon 19:00, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- I understand. AndreasKQ 19:39, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent edits. One of the nicest feelings when working on WP is when one creates a page, and it sits around doing nothing for a while, and then suddenly there's a flurry of activity as someone improves it beyond all recognition. Hornplease 07:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- You're quite welcome. Glad to help! Best, AndreasKQ 12:15, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
duplicate entry for NYC LGBT Community Center
[edit]thought you would like to know that there is an existing article for New York's LGBT Community Center under it's legal name of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Community Services Center, but we agree that it is sometimes a problem to find it since almost every place that has one calls theirs the LGBT Community Center or the LGBT Center or something like that, probably the best thing to do is to look in this List of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community centers first BiAndBi
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Talk:Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Community Center, by Dev920 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Talk:Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Community Center fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Talk:Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Community Center, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:43, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Cate Doty
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cate Doty, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Cate Doty. Horologium (talk) 15:04, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Michael Wines
[edit]
I have nominated Michael Wines, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Wines. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Russavia Dialogue 15:39, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Roja Heydarpour
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Roja Heydarpour, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Article subject has written a few newspaper articles, nothing to establish her as notable
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tomdobb (talk) 18:44, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Robert F. Worth
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Robert F. Worth, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- BLP with one reference that is not about him and this is NN journalist.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Drawn Some (talk) 02:43, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Martin Arnold (disambiguation)
[edit]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Martin Arnold (disambiguation). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Arnold (disambiguation). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:24, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
The article Lawrence Van Gelder has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:00, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]
Hello AndreasKQ! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Lawrence Van Gelder - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Michele McNally - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Ian Fisher (journalist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:02, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Thanassis Cambanis
[edit]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Thanassis Cambanis. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thanassis Cambanis. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, AndreasKQ. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, AndreasKQ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, AndreasKQ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Elena Rover has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mccapra (talk) 19:23, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
The article Stephanie Strom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Notability tag unaddressed for 4 years. Doesn't appear to have significant coverage of Strom herself from a Google search (as opposed to articles she has authored).
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Nomination of Stephanie Strom for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephanie Strom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Strom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SnowFire (talk) 19:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC)