User talk:Andre9977

Blocked

I have blocked you as another account of a series of editors who have been reintroducing the Sa-mp article. We don't like spammers, let alone those who edited for two years and with many accounts. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 22:58, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Andre9977 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is the only account I've ever had on Wikipedia and I used this to edit the SA-MP page once. I wasn't much aware of the Wikipedia advertising policies or anything. Backslash_Forward hasn't correctly reviewed my status before blocking me. I'm indeed a real person now interested in editing the The Saboteur article as a patch has been released. Since I don't have a reason to be banned, I expect to be unbanned, hopefully.

Decline reason:

Sorry, but your past history don't look like you're here to be constructive. –MuZemike 23:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.