User talk:Andonic/Archive 11

Comment on User talk:Majorly

No worries, thanks for the clarification. Take care :o) Dan68.99.6.90 02:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you requesting an RfA? ~Step trip 14:16, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to this comment. ~Step trip 14:28, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, it's pretty much guaranteed that you'll become an admin, because (as you probably already know) almost every user that Nishkid64 has nominated has been granted adminship, in addition to the fact that you have a well-rounded edit count. Btw, could you please review me (the link is the tilde in my sig)? ~Step trip 15:06, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There was a dutch study that proved that optimists lived longer ;-) ~Step trip 16:21, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure my last comment was true (I saw it in the laughter, the best medicine section of Reader's Digest, and thought it fit the situation well). ~Step trip 16:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do that ... I actually got the idea from Bluemoose ;-) ~Step trip 15:03, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oooh...email when that happens, I would be enlightened to co-nominate you. I am rather excited ! Good luck. ~ Arjun 02:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but be more careful before you accuse people next time

What I added was helpful and constructive, if you had read it. The picture being indicated in the section I edited had been moved up by another used, and is now above the text, not below, as I wished to correct by changing the words. Sadly, you just deleted this change without trying to assertain why it was made. If you had merely read the section in context, you would have seen that I was improving the article.

Thanks for changing the Saturn article back.

Laser revert

I think you mis-clicked while doing this revert. If not, please let me know what was wrong with my edit. Han-Kwang 09:00, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My B-star

Thanks a lot! I'm so shocked that I have another one of those! I owe you one (when I get the time I'll give you one). And sorry for the late reply; real life bites. Tohru Honda13 19:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:The Change you Made to Infinite Monkey Theorem

How was this unconstructive? That caption was clearly biased. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.157.33.196 (talk) 20:27, 9 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Signpost updated for April 9th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 15	9 April 2007	About the Signpost

Danny Wool regains adminship in controversial RFA	Leak last year likely to produce changes for handling next board election
Association of Members' Advocates' deletion debate yields no consensus	WikiWorld comic: "Fake shemp"
News and notes: Donation, Version 0.5, milestones	Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Random Data Page

I have nothing else to say but: LOL!! The surprising thing is, it only took a second topmload, though other pages take more like 3. Ry Guy 13:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

KFP's RfA thanks

Thank you for supporting me on my recent nomination for adminship, which passed with a tally of 45/0/0. Please let me know if I can help with something or if I make a mistake. Cheers! --KFP (talk | contribs) 15:03, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for spotting that one

You were right, thanks, grammar Nazi friend ;) -- lucasbfr ^talk 16:36, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi AndonicO,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Map of Jupiter.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 10, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-05-10. howcheng {chat} 19:10, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for April 16th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 16	16 April 2007	About the Signpost

Encyclopædia Britannica promoted to featured article	Wikipedia continues to get mixed reactions in education
WikiWorld comic: "Hodag"	News and notes: Wikipedia television mention makes news, milestones
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:38, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA

Hey AndonicO! "You've got questions!" They are here. Ryan ^{Got something to say?} 18:28, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Erm.. here. Ryan ^{Got something to say?} 18:30, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you goping to answer your questions and list the rfa? If you are uncomfterable let me know and I will kindly withdraw my co-nomination. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:55, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, he wanted to wait for Arjun to co-nominate. However, Arjun's been inactive as of late. Nishkid 64 14:48, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps he'll have more time during the weekend; I'll wait 'til Saturday for him, and then accept. · AO ^Talk 14:50, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Changed from "Monday" to "Saturday" in the above text. · AO ^Talk 16:46, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AndonicO! I want to give you a Strong Support on your RfA, but you haven't actually accepted the nomination. You've answered the questions, but I need to be able to support you before I forget! Good luck!! Reywas92^Talk 19:27, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I'll accept Saturday (you can't forget that quickly, can you?). :-) · AO ^Talk 19:40, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully not! I added it to my watchlist. Reywas92^Talk 19:43, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, AdonicO. You know how I mentioned about my friend, Mackabean. Well I was wondering if it would be okay if I asked him on Saturday to vote in favor of you. I don't know if that is allowed, and if it is do you want me to do that. I know one or two more people who might vote for you. --Random ^{Say it here!} 02:00, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Guess

Wild guess but WP:100? WP:200? Simply south 13:11, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't jinx it...but yeah maybe.--Clyde (talk) 13:17, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, I don't think so. 70 max I'd say. · AO ^Talk 14:15, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow

I'm completely in awe of your user pages. Your edit count is impressive. Everything about you is impressive. I'm new to wikipedia, and could use some advice. Please leave a message on my talk page. --The Random Edit or 00:53, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for you suggestions. I'm attempting to become an active member of Wikipedia. I have joined Projects including WP:CVU, WP:Typo & others. Reccommendations of any sort would be good. Also would you mind giving me some help with my UserPage? Thanks anyway. --Random ^{Say it here!} 23:07, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for the mistake. It won't happen again. Count me in though for when you do accept. Once again sorry.
--Random ^{Say it here!} 18:53, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yo, AO. I have a bit of a problem. A friend of mine Mackabean is doing a overhaul of Subprime lending. There is one problem. He can't get the External Links, or the Sources, or the See Aslo section to come up. He has it written in code, but it won't show up. I have tryed to fix the problem but can't. We could use your help. --Random ^{Say it here!} 23:06, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a million. --Random ^{Say it here!} 00:02, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need your support quick. There is this new editor his username is The way, the truth, and the life. I believe according to policy, because of the resemblance to a religious figure, in this case Jesus. They are discussing it here, and I need your vote.
Respectfully --Random ^{Say it here!} 16:34, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for both. One problem, when I went to change My Preferences, it told me it wasn't a valid html tag. I plan to downsize it even more as time goes by.
--Random ^{Say it here!} 23:00, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

are you an AMA member?

Are you an AMA member? --CyclePat 03:59, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So sorry...

That I couldn't reply to your email and nominate earlier. I have had very limited internet access and have been "extremely" busy. I wish you the best of luck. Soon you will be clearing the backlogs! ~ Arjun 16:54, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA comment

Well, yes I suppose they could be wrong ;) best of luck, mate. You've certainly put in the work to justify the janitor's trolley!

Kind regards,
anthony^[review] 19:06, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Post script — if you've got a minute (and you're not to tense, anxiously watching the history page of your RfA, and obsessively pressing "Clear Cache" :) I'd be honoured by a review by you; just a few words, if that's all you can spare!

re:question

My question was refering to Category:Rouge admins, and was written as sort of a paritally related follow-up to the IAR question.--Clyde (talk) 20:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:85.140.118.228

Someone from this IP vandalized on Wiki. But please, don't block the whole IP in any case. It's not permament for user, it is owned by our local provider (and half of Russia sits behind their routers).

I just saw that warning in "messages" section and suddenly get afraid of visiting Wiki one day and discovering massive IP-ban.

PS And yeah, it REALLY wasn't me who messed with editing. =)

slash213 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.140.118.228 (talk) 07:19, 22 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Bit o' help

First off, let me congradulate you on what will be a successful RFA (I know you're not supposed to count your chickens before they hatch, but unless you're caught with a dead girl or a live boy, you'll pass with a huge margin).

I come to you needing a bit of help. I have decided to change my Wikipedia signature (S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 ) after recieving complaints about it for.... years? I was wondering if you could assist me by designing an appropriate Wiki sig for me. Your new sig (with just AO) is minimalist but highlights your name, which is something I'm looking to do with my sig.

Any help would be greatly appreciated. S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 21:17, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for April 23rd, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 17	23 April 2007	About the Signpost

Administrator goes rogue, is blocked	Wales unblocks Brandt, then reverses himself
Historian detained after his Wikipedia article is vandalized	Efforts to reform Requests for Adminship spark animated discussion
Canadian politician the subject of an edit war	Virginia Tech massacre articles rise to prominence
Wikipedia enters China one disc at a time	WikiWorld comic: "Buttered cat paradox"
News and notes: Unreferenced biographies, user studies, milestones	Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:24, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

follow up to my question

Do you plan to be closing XfD's? — coel acan — 06:57, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar Thanks

Thanks for the barnstar! Hopefully soon you and I be fighting in the trenches, side by side as we clear the aiv backlogs! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:08, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

That sounds good to me(your answer). I guess maybe I have learned something new along with it. That it mistakes on that area from anyone from time to time is OK. I have recently went off the deep end, but have since then not only learned to assume good faith, I encoarge it, now. I am making efforts in that, and it looks like you are too, a required trait in administrators to demonstrate. Good luck on your RfA.--U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. (talk) 20:28, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of vandalism counter

I see that you removed the vandalism counter after the comment in your RFA. I tried to follow the reasoning, but I found the Meatball wiki reference to be nearly incomprehensible. My feeling is that the counter discourages user page vandalism by sending the message that vandalism is fleeting and merely results in another blip on the counter. However, if there is valid reasoning that the counter encourages or feeds vandalism, then I would like to know about it.--Kubigula (talk) 21:19, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To let you know, I agree with Kubigula and believe that you should replace it, (I.E., not give in to silly demands at RFA). However, it is your choice. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:08, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking request for 198.86.93.217

I did not block the user, since it wasn't clear they actually saw the final warning. If they vandalize again, then report them. wrp103 (Bill Pringle) ^(Talk) 13:55, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Photographer's Barnstar

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		I, Hojimachong, hereby award AndonicO this photographers barnstar, for getting his Persian Walnut picture on the main page. And for being God-like in his awesomeness. Hojimachong^talk 00:09, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smile

Mystytopia (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

01:09, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Your very welcome. Like my new username? Mystytopia (talk) 01:11, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In case you're confused, look at this. Mystytopia (talk) 01:16, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, I actually have about 10850, but I don't know why it says over 11,000 in the logs. Mystytopia (talk) 01:20, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship

I must say, I am very confuzzled as to why you aren't an administrator, especially since you express interest on your userpage. I don't know if you've filed an RfA before, but I think it's safe to say you would pass with flying colors. From what I can tell, you want to be an administrator, you'd make a good administrator, and others would want you to be an administrator. So, unless I am missing something here, I'd like to file an RfA on your behalf. Get back to me with an answer if you're interested. Thanks! --Hojimachong^talk 14:36, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hedgehog in a Flower Pot

Here's a hedgehog in a flower pot for you! Hedgehogs in flower pots somehow promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving something friendly to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others! Happy editing! ♠TomasBat (@)(Contribs)(Sign!) 18:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

bravo pour la noix

J'ai été très impressionné de voir une de tes images en page principale. Bravo donc, l'idée était très simple et personne ne l'avait eue avant. -- DLL ^{.. T} 21:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Novels WikiProject

Hi, and welcome to the Novels WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to fiction books often referred to as "Novels".

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated quite regularly. You can watch it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WikiProject_Novels_announcements}} there.
While you are updating your userpage, don't forget our userbox {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Outreach/User WPNOVELS}}.
The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but other methods are available.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

Starting some new articles? Our article structure guidelines / template outlines some things to include.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the members, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 08:16, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

I'm surprised to see your RfA is still twelve hours overdue. I tried to flag down a bureaucrat on IRC, but couldn't get anyone. Anyway, I just wanted to congratulate you on your successful RfA, AndonicO. I told you you would pass with flying colors :). Nishkid64 (talk) 19:16, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've never known any RfAs take so long to close :S Anyway, congratulations, and if you ever need any help just leave me a message, PM me or whatever and I'll do my best to help! Majorly (hot!) 19:24, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have made you a sysop, per your RFA. Congratulations. Make sure you are familiar with our policies before using your shiny new buttons. Raul654 20:11, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congadulations from me too... Good luck with the new administrative tools! ♠Tom @s Bat 20:34, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Sorry I was inactive during your rfa, but I recently noticed an error at the bottom of your rfa. I have posted it at the bottom of your rfa's talk page. There is a pink "did not succeed" tab at the bottom when I know it actually did pass. This might cause problems and confuse users. Please let someone fix it if possible, although I wouldn't be surprised if it already had. Thanks. PS. Congradulations on your thing, although I haven't yet said that to anyone before this especially ones I didn't vote in and I guess you could say that I think that I am saying this because that's the name of the section, bye I will go see if there's something to edit. – A stroHur ricane 00 1^{(Talk+Contribs+Ubx)(+sign here+How's my editing?)} 20:54, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats this day has come, this is a bad day for the vandals ;). Enjoy this moment. ~ Arjun 21:10, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on the win. --Random ^{Say it here!} 23:52, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have a nice shiny mop and bucket! **Hojimachong**^talk 00:34, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congradulations on your successful RfA. Have fun using the tools. ;) Mystytopia (talk) 10:35, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks everyone! :-) · AndonicO ^Talk 11:58, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, congratulations on a successful RFA! Hope you enjoy the tools :) Cheers, – Riana _ऋ 14:28, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh excellent, congratulations AO. =) Now, go block Jimbo for practice! ··coel acan 17:52, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hear he strongly encourages it. ··coel acan 17:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats, BUT WHERES THE PARTY! :-D. AxG ҈ ^►^talk 18:24, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, and all the best to you. -- Pastor David ^† _(Review) 18:33, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you justified the etymology of your username! Just in case you didn't know, it is a compound of ándras meaning "man" and the verb nikō meaning "to win". Also, see this guy! Niko Silver 23:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lukas19

Hi, you have had some dealings with this editor. I'd appreciate your opinion regarding a suspected sockpuppet if you have time. Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Lukas19. Cheers. Alun 14:48, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: WP:AIV

Thanks for imforming me on that :) My talk page was vandalized not so long before you gave me the message ([1]) Mystytopia (talk) 21:15, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, my talk page gets alot of vandalism (it has been vandalized 48 times). Mystytopia (talk) 21:19, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's unkind. Take a look at these edits to my userpage: [2] [3] [4]. Mystytopia (talk) 21:29, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's a bit funny; the anon put messages like that on other's userpages too. The anon's blocked for a month. Mystytopia (talk) 21:35, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats

First off, congratulations on your successfull RFA. Second off, I rsponded to your question on my talk page. Hope that helps! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:29, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats. :) – B.hotep ^u/_t• 18:49, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:GAYroute™

You said: "GAYroute told me by e-mail that he would change his username (I've explained WP:USERNAME to him) if I unblocked him. I hadn't seen you had denied the request for unblock (don't believe you had done it yet), so I unblocked, provided that he change his name. Is this alright? (I'm still a new admin, so I'm not too sure if I'm doing things correctly.)"

Absolutely, not a problem. I didn't block him initially, of course, but my only complaint was his username. --Yamla 15:13, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clearing stale reports from WP:AIV

I noticed you commented on one report on AIV, to leave up for a while to see if they remain active. While this is standard practice, notice that this particular user had not edited in over 8 hours, so there is no point in leaving the report up. Stale reports like these should just be cleared. The report in question was:

152.3.65.11 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Continued vandalism to UNC related pages. Please check history of IP address to confirm. Ebtunc2006 16:11, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Has not vandalized since third level warning, but I'll leave it on for a while, in case he/she does vandalize again. · AndonicO ^Talk 16:16, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, thanks for watching AIV and I hope you're enjoying the mop. —dgies^t_c 16:27, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Well, they did get an "only warning" earlier, not today but within the past couple of weeks. Also, it's a school IP. I feel very strongly (and have not been disagreed with so far) that we ought to respond liberally with blocks in the case of school-related vandalism: the real danger there is that vandalism will catch on and become a fun thing to do in the student culture, and then it becomes much harder to control. Also, since it won't be anyone's only point of access, it doesn't prevent people from editing under accounts they create at home. Mango juice^talk 16:44, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're Welcome.

You are very welcome. :) I was glad to support you. Acalamari 18:21, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded - you'll do great ;) take care ~ Anthony 18:33, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note

Thank you for your note on my talkpage. In retrospect I think you got a bit of a rough deal from me- you're certainly not the first to be hit hard for such discussions of their RfA and thinking about it I think you were placed in an ackward position by the comment you were replying to. I hope you'll see with experience how the accasional well-judged use of WP:IAR is necessary to keep this community going (and keep it from slidding down the precipice of bureaucracy on which it seems to be precariously perched). You seem like a really nice guy and my comments where overwhelmingly in a minority. I hope you come to enjoy being an admin. The main reason I dropped by was that I wanted to make it clear that the fact I did not support you in your RfA doesn't not mean that you don't have my support as an administrator. If there's ever anything I can help you with, please do get in touch. Best wishes, WjBscribe 19:00, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats

Just echoing the others on your RFA. I know you'll do a great job! Amphy 20:05, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decision not to block

Hi, can you please help me understand your decision not to block User:68.213.100.138? The IP has received the full spectrum of warnings in the past, as recently as April 23, culminating in a block. Are all four required every time a block is removed? (I understand that multiple people can use an IP address, but in this case the edits are to the same small set of articles.) Not looking to overturn your decision, just to understand policy better. Thanks! -Pete 20:35, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: RFA thanks

Of course! :) Mystytopia (talk) 21:02, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of course from my end as well...good luck, and have fun! JṃŁЌ¹⁷ 22:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fried brain sandwich?! :P bibliomaniac 1 5 22:58, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA Thanks

No problems. I'm glad you're taking advice on board, it's certainly a good thing. ~ G1ggy! _SPEAK! 23:06, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, enjoy the endless image backlogs and complaints you will receive (you got one already!). But well done nonetheless :) James086^{Talk | Email} 23:33, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have voted opposed on your RFA. However, I think you are nice person and I hope that my feeling mention in my vote would be wrong. regards. --- ALM 12:54, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have Fun

Have fun with your new tools.--Clyde (talk) 23:35, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrads! Dfrg.msc 07:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problems, I'm sure (as well as a consensus of Wikipedians) that you'll make a great admin. Have fun! Dfrg.msc 07:34, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats - Blogged!

Congrats again on your successful adminship run! It is so exciting that we met each other when we were newcomers and now we are admins! How truly exciting, let me know if you have any questions. Also I hope you don't mind that you are a topic of my latest blog entry, which can be seen here: http://wikiarjun.wordpress.com/2007/05/01/22/ . Also I took the picture, let me know what you think. I recently got a new dslr camera (Olympus E-500), and have been venturing into landscape (wide-angle) and even nature. Here are some of my recent shots: http://flickr.com/photos/arjun01 . Cheers! ~ Arjun 01:20, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for April 30th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 18	30 April 2007	About the Signpost

Students in Western Civilization course find editing Wikipedia frustrating, rewarding	Statistics indicate breadth of Wikipedia's appeal
Featured lists reaches a milestone	Backlogs continue to grow
WikiWorld comic: "Calvin and Hobbes"	News and notes: Board resolutions, user studies, milestones
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:06, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IRC cloak request

I am Andonic on freenode and I would like the cloak wikipedia/Andonic. Thanks. --· AndonicO ^Talk 20:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What now?

Do you have a current project that you're working on? --Thus Spake Anittas 20:14, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, just don't get burned out. :p --Thus Spake Anittas 20:22, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ya beat me!

To the block on Shaddamoosh! Great job, I would recommend using {{subst:vandalblock}} instead though. But that is just me ;). Cheers! ~ Arjun 20:50, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey glad to see you on the IRC! I need your help though, I tried setting up a cloak months ago but I never got one (i think). Can you please send me some very, very basic step by step instructions? Thanks. ~ Arjun 20:52, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]