User talk:Anclation~enwiki

This user may have left Wikipedia. Anclation~enwiki has not edited Wikipedia since 10 May 2007. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome from Redwolf24

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We as a community are glad to have you and thank you for creating a user account! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

Yes some of the links appear a bit boring at first, but they are VERY helpful if you ever take the time to read them.

Remember to place any articles you create into a category so we don't get orphans.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome.

Redwolf24 (Talk) 09:50, 20 August 2005 (UTC) The current date and time is 22 November 2024 T 15:02 UTC.[reply]

P.S. I like messages :-P

Our forum

Welcome to the Romanian Wikipedia notice board! This page is a portal for all Romanian-related topics and a place for Romanian editors to gather and socialize and debate. Discussions are encouraged, in both English and Romanian. Post any inquiry under their relevant cathegory.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Romanian_Wikipedian%27s_notice_board

--Anittas 18:05, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'll check it out Anclation 18:29, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to our forum! Please anytime when you need some help, just ping me on my talk page.-- Bonaparte talk 18:46, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship nomination for Anclation

I've nominated you for adminship at (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Anclation). Thankx. -- Bonaparte talk 12:03, 11 December 2005 (UTC) Iti respect decizia. Oricand vei fi pregatit si vei accepta vei avea sprijinul meu. Mult succes mai departe! -- Bonaparte talk 12:53, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WTF? You don't even know the guy! Are you out of your mind? --Anittas 17:28, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Romania

Hi Anclation! I've read your page about Romania ([1]) and I just want to congratulate you for it! It's also great to see you're collaborating at Romania-related articles? Have you been to Romania recently? Which part of Norway are you from? I've been to Oslo and Bergen in Norway, and it was great! Cheers, Ronline ✉ 11:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ronline, it's always nice to receive praise, especially from such a respected Wikipedia contributer such as yourself. And to answer your questions, I visited Romania this Easter and hope to visit the country yearly from now on. I currently live in Oslo, the capital of Norway. Anclation 12:46, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah! Good job Anclation! Keep working we stand by you! Bonaparte talk 22:11, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This might interest you... ;)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seal_hunting

The article could need some expansion. --Anittas 11:38, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Noticeboard

Thank you 4 defending us, but pls, don't feed them. They are in the troll state right now. Mihai -^talk 20:02, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LMAO, what a n00b. Go and listen to manele! --Anittas 20:06, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anittas

Hi Anclation! I think the recent behaviour of Anittas is very worrying, particularly since he has continued to make personal attacks even after two RfC have been conducted regarding his actions. I'm thinking of starting an RfArbCom against him, since it seems that he doesn't want to refrain from making personal attacks, even though multiple users have tried to explain to him why his comments were against policy. What do you think? Thanks, Ronline ✉ 05:54, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He doesn't care about your opinion. He already made up his mind. He just wants your vote, that's all. --Anittas 06:00, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do care very much about other people's opinions. This is not about getting anyone's vote, it's about coming up with a solution that satisfies all parties.

Ronline ✉ 06:02, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You already made up your mind about this, so why ask for his opinion? --Anittas 06:05, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because I respect community consensus. If no one else thinks that starting an RfArb is appropriate, I will reconsider. I don't want to start arbitration just for the sake of it, since I think it's quite a significant move. However, seeing as you have continued making personal attacks, RfArb remains the only option after two unsuccessful RfCs.

Ronline ✉ 06:15, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't lie. You already made up your mind when you said this:

I'm currently in the process of starting a request for arbitration against Anittas, for the personal attacks he continued making after his second RfC, as well as for the insults that were not rectified in that RfC. I would like to know if you would support this RfArb.

In fact, you made up your mind long before you started the RfC. This was a part of your masterplan. --Anittas 06:17, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I probably shouldn't be writing this to you on another user's talkpage, since it's cluttering up the page, but there is no masterplan. You seem to think that everything is a conspiracy against you. To be honest, my first reaction after you made the anti-gay statements and after the messages to your talk page regarding them, was to start an RfArb. However, I figured that an RfC would be better in that case because it's more flexible and less punitive. What worries me is that you haven't taken anything in that RfC seriously - you've continued to make just as harsh personal attacks. So, it's not some grand masterplan where I seek to intentionally make you say personal attacks. I've got absolutely nothing against you as a user. However, when you make personal attacks, I've told you. And it seems that discussion doesn't help - and I've tried that so many times - because you just don't want to respect policy and be civil and no make personal attacks on other users.

Ronline ✉ 06:25, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My point here was simple: you did not come here to ask for his opinion. You came here to have his support. Your statement to other users, that I have posted here, proves this. --Anittas 06:27, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's not right. To the other users that you made personal attacks against, I asked for their support. To Anclation, I asked for his opinion, since he is a neutral observer.

Ronline ✉ 06:36, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you asked for their support, it means that you have already decided to start the Arb. In that case, what good will Anclation's opinion do? Answer me that one. --Anittas 06:43, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late answer. Yes, I have decided to start the Arb, but that doesn't mean that it's all set in stone. I just wanted Anclation's opinion, since he is neutral and I value his opinion on this matter. Also, he witnessed the dispute quite extensively and so knew about the case. I hope this makes sense.

Ronline ✉ 12:37, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anittas, revision of position

Thanks for the reply, Anclation. I am actually considering not starting an RfArb at the moment, if only because Anittas did engage in more constructive dialogue relating to his talk page, and the issue with Node's picture was resolved (resulting in a 24 hour block). I would just really appreciate it if he stops making any personal attacks from now on. It would also be good if he apologises to Orioane for calling him a "traitor to Romania". Ronline ✉ 12:37, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

template / apologies

I apologize fot template deletion without much thinking. I see you didn't edit much in English wikipedia and probably have no good idea about my attitude to Romanians. My problem was long fight with sick ultra-nationalist troll Bonaparte, which actually did much harm to the reputation of Romanians; much more than he wrote useful articles. Please take a look to my contributions in Romanian topics.

May be you understand that I am not enemy of Romania. I happen to have a different kind of knowledge, a hisory that is little known. mikka (t) 18:58, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

reply

Thank you for introducing me to the Romanian portal.I was in fact in need for some guidance about a Romanian related article and that was the best place to post my plea!And it came at the right tim:)Thanks--Radufan 20:46, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: The Romanian forum

Thanks for poining it out, I wasn't aware of it. Dmaftei 16:20, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful !

Bai, fi atent, ca dobitocii astia vor sa ne stearga tag-urile care spun ca suntem in favoarea unificarii Romania-Moldova, pentru ca vasazaica sunt "polemice si inflamatorii" ! Gimme a friggin' break ! Sa nu cumva sa-i lasi sa-ti modifice pagina, daca it-i vor scoate elemente din, ea, sa le pui la loc. Am sa transmit mesajul si la ceilalti Romani. Bafta. -Voievod 18:28, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lucian Bute

Hey, nice work on Lucian Bute on the Romanian wikipedia. You can always add stuff like stats and career highlights on the English article as well. Thanks for taking interest in my article and one of the best young prospects in boxing ! -Voievod 23:38, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Votează contra ştergerii articolului Heaven of Transnistria

Împreună cu EvilAlex (un tip din Tighina - Transnistria) am creat un articol despre propaganda separatistă a Tiraspolului Heaven of Transnistria. I s-a cerut ştergerea. Te rog ajută-ne să păstrăm articolul, votînd contra ştergerii[2]. Destul s-a şters din articolul principal Transnistria, Wikipedia e plină de propagandă a Tiraspolului, să avem măcar un articol care explică această propagandă--MariusM 18:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but you voted for opening of Siberian Wikipedia, so maybe you will vote against the proposal for it's closure: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects

--62.68.146.96 03:44, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Racism Breaks the Game

Hi! Thanks for telling me about the Racism Breaks the Game initiative. I have created an article on the topic at Racism Breaks the Game. Cheers, Ronline ✉ 05:13, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Siberian" Wikipedia

Hello! Recently, you cast a vote against closure of the "Siberian" Wikipedia, presumably basing it on the supposed existence of the "Siberian language" with millions of speakers. Perhaps the issue was misunderstood. There is no Siberian language or Siberian nation, apart from the native Turkic and other peoples who lived there long before Russian colonists arrived in the 16th century. The matter in question is an artificial "language" created based on several archaic Russian dialects in 2005 by a Mr. Zolotarev and a few of his friends, inclusion of which fairly blatantly violates the No Original Research policy of Wikipedia. Siberian Slavs speak Russian and list themselves on censuses as Russians, Ukrainians, and Belarusans - this you can verify for yourself. I invite you to return to participate in the discussion and reconsider your vote, and appreciate constructive debate on the topic. Cossack 00:01, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Siberian wikipedia thanks you for your vote in our support. Unfortunately, many votes in this voting http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Siberian_Wikipedia are alleged to be falsified. We need you to verify your vote. There are two ways of doing it: you can confirm it right below this request or you can do this by adding to your user page a link to your meta account (like this:[3]") --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 23:50, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Health Wiki Research

A colleague and I are conducting a study on health wikis. We are looking at how wikis co-construct health information and create communities. We noticed that you are a frequent contributor to Wikipedia on health topics.

Please consider taking our survey here.

This research will help wikipedia and other wikis understand how health information is co-created and used.

We are from James Madison University in Harrisonburg, Virginia. The project was approved by our university research committee and members of the Wikipedia Foundation.

Thanks, --Sharlene Thompson 18:12, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Voting

Hi! Here is a voting about Bendery/Bender/Tighina: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bender%2C_Moldova#Statement_of_Title_Solution --80.142.252.220 (talk) 19:05, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Dacia

Bună! I've been working to set up the WikiProject Dacia to organize better the articles about Dacia and improve their quality. We need help expanding and reviewing many articles, and we also need more images. Maybe you find it interesting and wish to join. Thanks and best regards! --Codrin.B (talk) 22:19, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Romania

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 05:55, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Anclation. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Anclation~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

21:53, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

10:26, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Cupa României

Can you help me by editing more seasons of Cupa României ? I already started, just create a few and soon will be done !Alexiulian25 (talk) 20:24, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

and also Liga II.--Alexiulian25 (talk) 01:24, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who like NationStates

Hey! Based on your edits to NationStates, I thought maybe you would be interested that I started a series of userboxes for the game NationStates. Feel free to add any or add your own!-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 05:27, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Gilles de Rais (Castlevania)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gilles de Rais (Castlevania). Since you had some involvement with the Gilles de Rais (Castlevania) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 22:07, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]