User talk:Ancheta Wis/Archive 11
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Ancheta Wis. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 |
Administrators' newsletter – April 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).
- Alexandria • Happyme22 • RexxS
- Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
- Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the
delete-redirect
userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.
- When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
- Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)
- A community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure is open until April 25.
Nomination for deletion of Template:PhysicsTOC
Template:PhysicsTOC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 00:19, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).
Interface administrator changes
- Following an RfC, consensus was found that third party appeals are allowed but discouraged.
- The 2021 Desysop Policy RfC was closed with no consensus. Consensus was found in a previous RfC for a community based desysop procedure, though the procedure proposed in the 2021 RfC did not gain consensus.
- The user group
oversight
will be renamed tosuppress
. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.
- The user group
- The community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure was closed, and an initial draft based on feedback from the now closed consultation is expected to be released in early June to early July for community review.
Administrators' newsletter – June 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).
- Ashleyyoursmile • Less Unless
- Husond • MattWade • MJCdetroit • Carioca • Vague Rant • Kingboyk • Thunderboltz • Gwen Gale • AniMate • SlimVirgin (deceased)
- Consensus was reached to deprecate Wikipedia:Editor assistance.
- Following a Request for Comment the Book namespace was deprecated.
- Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.
- After a Clarification request, the Arbitration Committee modified Remedy 5 of the Antisemitism in Poland case. This means sourcing expectations are a discretionary sanction instead of being present on all articles. It also details using the talk page or the Reliable Sources Noticeboard to discuss disputed sources.
Disambiguation link notification for June 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States Army Acquisition Corps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capability.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
- Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.
- An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.
- IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.
- The community authorised COVID-19 general sanctions have been superseded by the COVID-19 discretionary sanctions following a motion at a case request. Alerts given and sanctions placed under the community authorised general sanctions are now considered alerts for and sanctions under the new discretionary sanctions.
Help needed for Quad (company)
Hello, I'm Tina, and I work for the Wisconsin-based company Quad. I recently made several edit requests to update Quad's Wikipedia page, and was hoping someone with a special interest in Wisconsin and the companies that grew up there, would like to help out with those edits. I would really appreciate it if you could go over to the Talk:Quad page and look over and implement my edit requests which add a lot of important information to the page. Thanks so much, Tina at Quad (talk) 14:22, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).
|
|
- An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.
- Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)
- Following an amendment request, the committee has clarified that the Talk page exception to the 500/30 rule in remedy 5 of the Palestine-Israel articles 4 case does not apply to requested move discussions.
- You can vote for candidates in the 2021 Board of Trustees elections from 4 August to 17 August. Four community elected seats are up for election.
Disambiguation link notification for August 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reorganization plan of United States Army, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conflict.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scientific method, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Protocol.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).
- Feedback is requested on the Universal Code of Conduct enforcement draft by the Universal Code of Conduct Phase 2 drafting committee.
- A RfC is open on whether to allow administrators to use extended confirmed protection on high-risk templates.
- A discussion is open to decide when, if ever, should discord logs be eligible for removal when posted onwiki (including whether to oversight them)
- A RfC on the next steps after the trial of pending changes on TFAs has resulted in a 30 day trial of automatic semi protection for TFAs.
- The Score extension has been re-enabled on public wikis. It has been updated, but has been placed in safe mode to address unresolved security issues. Further information on the security issues can be found on the mediawiki page.
- A request for comment is in progress to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules. Comments and new proposals are welcome.
- The 2021 RfA review is now open for comments.
Cite error: The opening <ref>
tag is malformed or has a bad name (see the help page).== What error message are you trying to fix? ==
Here specifically. I see none. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:48, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Headbomb: Under Page Statistics, Bugs [hide]Powered by Project Check Wikipedia
Edit 1 Template without correct beginning }} Physicist Richard Feynman coined Found a template with "}}", but no corresponding "{{". --Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 22:30, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Sounds like an issue with WP:CHECKWIKI. I suggest reporting the error there. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:34, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2021).
- Following an RfC, extended confirmed protection may be used preemptively on certain high-risk templates.
- Following a discussion at the Village Pump, there is consensus to treat discord logs the same as IRC logs. This means that discord logs will be oversighted if posted onwiki.
- DiscussionTools has superseded Enterprisey's reply-link script. Editors may switch using the "Discussion tools" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features.
- A motion has standardised the 500/30 (extended confirmed) restrictions placed by the Arbitration Committee. The standardised restriction is now listed in the Arbitration Committee's procedures.
- Following the closure of the Iranian politics case, standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed.
- The Arbitration Committee encourages uninvolved administrators to use the discretionary sanctions procedure in topic areas where it is authorised to facilitate consensus in RfCs. This includes, but is not limited to, enforcing sectioned comments, word/diff limits and moratoriums on a particular topic from being brought in an RfC for up to a year.
- Editors have approved expanding the trial of Growth Features from 2% of new accounts to 25%, and the share of newcomers getting mentorship from 2% to 5%. Experienced editors are invited to add themselves to the mentor list.
- The community consultation phase of the 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process is open for editors to provide comments and ask questions to candidates.
Administrators' newsletter – November 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2021).
- Phase 2 of the 2021 RfA review has commenced which will discuss potential solutions to address the 8 issues found in Phase 1. Proposed solutions that achieve consensus will be implemented and you may propose solutions till 07 November 2021.
- Toolhub is a catalogue of tools which can be used on Wikimedia wikis. It is at https://toolhub.wikimedia.org/.
- GeneralNotability, Mz7 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2021 Arbitration Committee Elections. Ivanvector and John M Wolfson are reserve commissioners.
- Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves to stand in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections from 07 November 2021 until 16 November 2021.
- The 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process has concluded with the appointment of five new CheckUsers and two new Oversighters.
Concern regarding Draft:Paul E. Biggs
Hello, Ancheta Wis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Paul E. Biggs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:05, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Administrators' newsletter – December 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).
- Unregistered editors using the mobile website are now able to receive notices to indicate they have talk page messages. The notice looks similar to what is already present on desktop, and will be displayed on when viewing any page except mainspace and when editing any page. (T284642)
- The limit on the number of emails a user can send per day has been made global instead of per-wiki to help prevent abuse. (T293866)
- Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee Elections is open until 23:59, 06 December 2021 (UTC).
- The already authorized standard discretionary sanctions for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes), broadly construed, have been made permanent.
Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Getting Things Done, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Allen.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
Merchandise giveaway nomination
A token of thanks
Hi Ancheta Wis! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk ~~~~~
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
- Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.
- Additionally, consensus for proposal 6C of the 2021 RfA review has led to the creation of an administrative action review process. The purpose of this process will be to review individual administrator actions and individual actions taken by users holding advanced permissions.
- Following the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Cabayi, Donald Albury, Enterprisey, Izno, Opabinia regalis, Worm That Turned, Wugapodes.
- The functionaries email list (functionaries-enlists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.
How we will see unregistered users
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- responded on Meta --Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 20:53, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Happy First Edit Day!
Edit warring on Science
Can we please get some order here?[1]. I don't want to revert anymore and the user doesn't seem interested in discussing despite efforts encouraging them to do so. danielkueh (talk) 19:20, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).
- The Universal Code of Conduct enforcement guidelines have been published for consideration. Voting to ratify this guideline is planned to take place 7 March to 21 March. Comments can be made on the talk page.
- The user group
oversight
will be renamedsuppress
in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections. - The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.
- The user group
- Community input is requested on several motions aimed at addressing discretionary sanctions that are no longer needed or overly broad.
- The Arbitration Committee has published a generalised comment regarding successful appeals of sanctions that it can review (such as checkuser blocks).
- A motion related to the Antisemitism in Poland case was passed following a declined case request.
- Voting in the 2022 Steward elections will begin on 07 February 2022, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2022, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Voting in the 2022 Community Wishlist Survey is open until 11 February 2022.
Administrators' newsletter – March 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).
|
|
- A RfC is open to change the wording of revision deletion criterion 1 to remove the sentence relating to non-infringing contributions.
- A RfC is open to discuss prohibiting draftification of articles over 90 days old.
- The deployment of the reply tool as an opt-out feature, as announced in last month's newsletter, has been delayed to 7 March. Feedback and comments are being welcomed at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project. (T296645)
- Special:Nuke will now allow the selection of standard deletion reasons to be used when mass-deleting pages. This was a Community Wishlist Survey request from 2022. (T25020)
- The ability to undelete the talk page when undeleting a page using Special:Undelete or the API will be added soon. This change was requested in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey. (T295389)
- Several unused discretionary sanctions and article probation remedies have been rescinded. This follows the community feedback from the 2021 Discretionary Sanctions review.
- The 2022 appointees for the Ombuds commission are Érico, Faendalimas, Galahad, Infinite0694, Mykola7, Olugold, Udehb and Zabe as regular members and Ameisenigel and JJMC89 as advisory members.
- Following the 2022 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AntiCompositeNumber, BRPever, Hasley, TheresNoTime, and Vermont.
- The 2022 Community Wishlist Survey results have been published alongside the ranking of prioritized proposals.
Disambiguation link notification for March 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited EU Battlegroup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maneuver.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Internet Archive Scholar vs. JSTOR
Hello, I see on your user page that you use JSTOR and I'd like to know more about your experience. By my calculations, a good 70 % of the main JSTOR content is now available for everyone at Internet Archive Scholar, with full text search provided e.g. at https://scholar.archive.org/ . The service is still in beta, but I've used it for some source-finding and it seems quite usable to me; I wonder whether that's just my experience. If you have a chance, the next time you'd be looking for a source on Google Scholar or JSTOR or similar, to perform the same search on IA scholar instead, I'd be curious to hear how it ends up. Thanks, Nemo 19:06, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Nemo, I tried finding: A.Mark Smith translator of De Aspectibus from the Latin and editor, Alhacen on Refraction (2010), which is an English translation of De Aspectibus. De Aspectibus is a Latin translation of all 7 books of Alhacen's Kitab al Manazir c.1027 in Arabic, or Book of Optics, which has 7 parts, denoted books 1 to 7. Internet Archive Scholar found Smith 2010 Alhacen on Refraction, which is just part 7 of Kitab al Manazir (volume 1 is the Introduction, and Latin translation from Arabic c.1270; Volume 2 is the English translation and footnotes) (Smith 2001, 2006, 2008, and 2010 each have a Volume 1 and 2).
- @Nemo The IAS data is somehow mixed up. Smith 2001 should be the first three books of Alhacen, Smith 2006 should be books 4-5, Smith 2008 should be book 6. Smith 2010 translates Alhacen's book 7 as Alhacen on Refraction, which IAS found. But A.Mark Smith is also the translator of all 7 books of De Aspectibus from the Latin. The first three books, or Smith 2001 Alhacen's theory of Visual Perception, were not so easy to find on Internet Archive Scholar.
- My years of experience using JSTOR have made searches on JSTOR far easier for me; my edits on Book of Optics, Ibn Al-Haytham, Scientific method, etc use JSTOR citations. I could switch, but I am apprehensive of the time I would have to invest in a new user experience. If you would like me to dig,
- I could pursue this. For example I could try to find Elizabeth Asmis, Epicurus' scientific method on Internet Archive Scholar.
- No results matched your criteria; Something went wrong. If the problem persists, please contact us.
- -- 22:09, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- A vanilla search from the browser yielded the pages of Asmis' book on archive.org. But then I have to log in. How vulnerable is archive.org? I doubt they are as big as Wikimedia. --Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 22:18, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- Next, I (manually, it's not like Google Scholar) searched for Epicurus' idea that an event (however unlikely) must show up during the infinite passage of time ... and there it was, on pp.258-259. -- 23:01, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- Then I searched for the idea that 'the gods live in the interstices [between the atoms (the void)]' What I found on p.320 was "as Lucretius shows, the Epicureans in turn inferred that the gods cannot have an abode in this world, since the world is too coarsely textured to support them; thus the gods live in the interspaces between worlds.[79]" .
- @Nemo In summary, archive.org does not support multi-word search, but single-word search works. Not as easy to use as JSTOR searches of multi-word searches, but you can get used to it. -- 23:35, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- https://scholar.archive.org/ (IAS?) depends on the completeness of its repository. I was hoping to test multi-word searches for
- the full text of Elizabeth Asmis (1984), Epicurus' scientific method, but nothing.
- Elizabeth Asmis (1976), Epicurus' scientific method is an IBM selectric typed manuscript which exists in pdf, is not available to IAS yet.
- All of this reaffirms the value that Wikipedia itself provides. --Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 02:10, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- No doubt on your final sentence!
- Yes, for books it's better to search directly on archive.org, for instance there is https://archive.org/details/epicurusscientif0000asmi . Many Internet Archive books can also be found from a general search engine, but using https://archive.org/search.php ensures that you're not missing anything and that you can use a full text search.
- Now sure what you mean by "vulnerable", but the Internet Archive has a size comparable to that of the Wikimedia Foundation, as they both have hundreds of employees and collaborators, although I believe the Wikimedia Foundation nowadays has ten times the budget. The Internet Archive has been around for longer than the Wikimedia Foundation and has a more stable course; it's also generally more committed to user privacy. I definitely recommend creating an account there.
- JSTOR/Ithaka Harbors on the other hand is a very puzzling entity and I'm not sure how long it will be around. Nowadays it seems to be mostly some kind of financial institution, designed to facilitate the transfer of wealth from universities to publishers: maybe for this reason its board is stacked with people from private equity funds. According to its form 990, its biggest expenses are publisher payments and executive compensation, while only a fraction of the revenues goes into paying for additional services to users. Nemo 16:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).
- An RfC is open proposing a change to the minimum activity requirements for administrators.
- Access to Special:RevisionDelete has been expanded to include users who have the
deletelogentry
anddeletedhistory
rights. This means that those in the Researcher user group and Checkusers who are not administrators can now access Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (T301928) - When viewing deleted revisions or diffs on Special:Undelete a back link to the undelete page for the associated page is now present. (T284114)
- Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures § Opening of proceedings has been updated to reflect current practice following a motion.
- A arbitration case regarding Skepticism and coordinated editing has been closed.
- A arbitration case regarding WikiProject Tropical Cyclones has been opened.
- Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement guidelines has closed, and the results were that 56.98% of voters supported the guidelines. The results of this vote mean the Wikimedia Foundation Board will now review the guidelines.