User talk:Ancestralmktg
A tag has been placed on Nocera's Law, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Steve (Slf67) talk 03:14, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Helping out
[edit]Firstly, please add comments to the bottom of a user's talk page, I missed your plea for help for a while. And add a new section with the + tab.
Nocera's Law was deleted as it is not notable enough for an article. Nocera's Law or Nocera's Theory gets only three Google hits so it is always going to get deleted as the term is not wideley used.
Family Forest Project was at "Family Forest Project", but I am going to move it as article titles shouldn't have quotes, and the real company is Family Forest, so edit this one: Family Forest. However, you need to add references to support that this company is, again, notable and has widespread media coverage.
Your additions were to Communication theory, where you added Thomas Nocera. If you think he is worthy of an article, and you can verify everything you write with references, then go ahead and create it! Hope that helps, drop me a line if you need more help. --Steve (Slf67) talk 04:09, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
The article Family Forest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails notability criteria - looks like it was created by a marketing firm to hype company
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Agricolae (talk) 00:15, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Family Forest for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Family Forest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family Forest until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Agricolae (talk) 06:06, 15 April 2011 (UTC)