User talk:Anayame

Welcome!

Hello, Anayame! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Atlantic306 (talk) 20:04, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

A page you started (Asad Majeed Khan) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Asad Majeed Khan.

User:Lapablo while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for creating this page, keep doing the good work.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lapablo}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lapablo (talk) 11:54, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Lapablo:, thank you for your appreciatoin. Anayame (talk) 06:58, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Chris Ghika) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Chris Ghika.

User:Lapablo while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Keep up the good work

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lapablo}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lapablo (talk) 12:02, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Lapablo:, again thank you for your appreciation, I think I'm going good so far. Hope will do the best in the upcoming time. Anayame (talk) 07:02, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An extended welcome

Hi Anayame. Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Ronz (talk) 17:03, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ronz:, Thank you for the appreciation and it was a great piece of advice. I am learning how to do things on Wikipedia, luckily everything is well explained on Wikipedia and I read those pieces of information before I do anything. I hope, I have not done anything wrong for now. The things you shared here will further enlighten me, I hope. Anayame (talk) 06:46, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hello Anayame. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Anayame. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Anayame|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:48, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Yunshui ^雲 _水 14:59, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request of unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anayame (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here @Yunshui: I was surprised to know that I had been blocked for an unjustified reason. I have nothing do with the account which been associated with me. Have a look at my edit history, every edit I'm doing is with my interset and knowledge. It is totally unfair to block this way without any investigation. If proved, I myself will quit Wikipedia, but to block this way is not fair at all. Anayame (talk) 17:17, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It is perfectly clear that this account has been run by an undisclosed paid editor acting in violation of the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use. It is also clear that there has been abuse of accounts to evade blocks on other accounts; an account which had been used to edit on behalf of an organisation became blocked, and the block was then evaded by use of another account, and whether the two accounts were actually operated by the same person is completely irrelevant (though I have a clear impression as to which is more likely). JamesBWatson (talk) 19:15, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.