User talk:Anatomy iggmc

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 22:38, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anatomy iggmc, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Kautilya3 (talk) 14:33, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes these two accounts belongs to me I want to not ify it to check user,what will be the procedure Anatomy iggmc (talk) 15:05, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please click on the link "guide to responding to investigations" and read the page. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:12, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I am a new user I am not able to notify check user please help me out Anatomy iggmc (talk) 15:13, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can go to the investigation page and write an explanation of why you are doing this. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:37, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you use this account exclusively from now on, because the other one will be very likely deleted. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:41, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Your recent editing history at Tablighi Jamaat shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Kautilya3 (talk) 14:32, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article that is presented which I have reverted do not have proper reliable resources Anatomycbmcb (talk) 14:34, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Anatomycbmcb reported by User:Kautilya3 (Result: ). Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 15:27, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Abusing multiple accounts.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. You have also been using a second account called Anatomycbmcb (talk · contribs) to participate in the same edit war at Tablighi Jamaat. EdJohnston (talk) 16:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]