User talk:Anar kerimxanov
We were very happy to have you in our challenge!
[edit]Peace Treaties in Art 30 x 30 Challenge This badge is to show our gratitude for your remarkable contribution to the Peace Treaties in Art 30 x 30 Challenge. We hope you found the contest stimulating, eskerrik asko / thank you! Iñaki LL (talk) 10:28, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Mahir Madatov for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mahir Madatov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahir Madatov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:34, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Santiago Bueno
[edit]He is not notable but I will create a draft article shortly. GiantSnowman 12:45, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Valentin Antov
[edit]Sorry, but no. The player fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY so an article about Antov would be deleted anyway. He has to feature for CSKA Sofia's first team in a league game (or for another team in the Bulgarian First League) to be notable. Yavorescu (talk) 16:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Amadou Toudjani for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amadou Toudjani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amadou Toudjani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:05, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
July 2017
[edit]Hello, I'm JMHamo. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ryan Sessegnon without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JMHamo (talk) 15:55, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Edit summaries
[edit]Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Kosack (talk) 15:57, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
The article Kaspars Kokins has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
fails soccer notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 05:53, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
September 2017
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did at Max Stryjek, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 19:29, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
December 2017
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jake Maltby, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 14:01, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Harry Kite, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Nzd (talk) 16:09, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Jacob Berkeley-Agyepong for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jacob Berkeley-Agyepong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Berkeley-Agyepong until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
August 2018
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bubacarr Sanneh, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 14:08, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Khaladdin Musayev moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Khaladdin Musayev, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 20:22, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Khaladdin Musayev (version 2)
[edit]Hello, Anar kerimxanov. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Khaladdin Musayev".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 08:10, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctions
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.