User talk:Anansey the Spider

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anansey the Spider (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked without any warning whatsoever by a very involved admin (admin abuse), who called me a "troll" simply because he did not like my expressing my opinion on an article talkpage discussion, and this admin is clearly trying to create a false "consensus" by threatening to block anyone who dissents from his POV, thereby leaving only one "allowed" POV.

Decline reason:

Comments such as this have no purpose other than to inflame the situation. Looking though your very short list of contributions, it seems you have a history of these sorts of comments (some examples). I'd say Moreschi's assessment is accurate. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 00:01, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anansey the Spider (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Where is the policy that allows admins like Moreschi to WP:OWN a highly controversial article, stifle all discussion, and hand out blocks to anyone who says anything he doesn't approve of on the talkpage? NOTE, I HAVE NOT EVER ACTUALLY VIOLATED ANY RULES WHATSOEVER, WAS NEVER WARNED, AND YET I AM UNFAIRLY PENALIZED INDEFINITELY, ONLY FOR EXPRESSING A DISSENTING OPINION ON HOW TO EDIT A CONTROVERSIAL TOPIC. THIS IS DRACONIAN, PEOPLE LIKE THAT ARE WHAT GIVES WIKIPEDIA A BAD REPUTATION IT DOESN'T DESERVE. If I am not unblocked, I promise I will personally inform Jimbo about this abusive administrator who thinks he has special authority to control opinions with his admin tools.

Decline reason:

Leaving blocked as threats and hostility are not encouraging when the concerns are about your temperament. — either way (talk) 00:56, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You would be mighty pissed off too, if you were judged, condemned, and penalized, only for expressing an opinion about an article, without even any pretense of due process, by people who act like their own shit doesn't stink. Now notifying Jimbo... Anansey the Spider (talk) 01:04, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]