User talk:AnamikaWrites

Welcome!

Hello, AnamikaWrites, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Pratik Sen, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Celestina007 (talk) 19:17, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pratik Sen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pratik Sen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Celestina007 (talk) 19:17, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Appreciate your feedback and have reframed the article to ensure the point of view is neutral and will not be considered promotional.

Pratik Sen is an established actor and public figure and the intent of the article is to prepare a wikipedia page for him. It is not spam. All information collated about Pratik Sen is factual.

Will appreciate if the article is reinstated so that I may make the necessary edits / amendments and submit for review.

Thanks ---- Geeta AnamikaWrites (talk) 17:55, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:TeleAcademyAward2022 PratikSen with CM.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:TeleAcademyAward2022 PratikSen with CM.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for the feedback, sharing the links and detailed clarification on how to resolve the issue. The Tele Academy Awards is arranged by West Bengal Government (India) to honour the artists of Tollywood (Bengali cinema/ Bengali language based film industry) for their contribution. This event was covered extensively by press media, photographers and freelancers apart from independent audience. Thats what you mean when you say it could be adequately covered by a freely licensed file - right?

Will it help if I trace this picture back to the photographer and credit the photographer? Example, Pic Credit - Publication Name: Photographer name or Pic Credit: Freelance Photographer: Name ? Thats a question to be directed to the Media copyright questions page - yes?

Also I see you have reduced the image size for the 3 images and indicated that the previous versions will be deleted June 3. Will the current version be deleted too after a few days?

Much appreciate your guidance. Thanks ---- AnamikaWrites (talk) 09:07, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pratik Sen (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pratik Sen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pratik Sen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 16:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I am unclear and confused why the article was declined. Request a more detailed feedback on what needs to be improved on the article to have it accepted for submission.

Pratik Sen is a notable person, a very well established film actor with significant coverage by independent and reliable sources including E-Times the online entertainment portal of Times of India, the 3rd largest newspaper publication in India; AnandaBazaar Patrika, the largest Indian-Bengali daily newspaper with over 1 million copies in circulation apart from other publications.

Prima facie, I believed that the guidelines defined by Wikipedia were met. I was conscious to maintain a neutral point of view, devoid of puffery. I have also included multiple references to articles published about Pratik Sen in notable Indian newspapers with huge national coverage. Some of the references on films that Pratik Sen has acted in are by authors who are verified by Wikipedia too.

Happy to edit and fix the issues you have identified. However, I will need your guidance on what needs to be fixed. Thanks ---- AnamikaWrites (talk) 17:02, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that you forget about this draft, and focus on editing existing articles for a few months at least, before attempting to create a draft about some other topic. Creating a new article is the hardest thing to do in Wikipedia, for several reasons. --bonadea contributions talk 12:02, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AnamikaWrites! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 16:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'd like that - to have experienced editors lend a hand to have the article on Pratik Sen published. Thanks ---- AnamikaWrites (talk) 05:54, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My edits to PS were to clean it up a bit. I know nothing about PS. Teahouse and Help Desk are places to ask for advice (don't ask same questions at both), but not for finding people to co-author the draft. Also, be aware that Times of India is not considered a reliable source reference by Wikipedia. David notMD (talk) 11:01, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the edits and the inputs. Definitely helps understand what is the ask.

The only thing that surprised me was The Times of India (TOI) not being considered a reliable source reference by Wikipedia. Apart from being the highest circulating English newspaper in India, every Wikipedia article/page on the Acting Icons or any other prominent Indian personality has references from TOI (Ratan Tata, Amitabh Bachchan, Mohanlal, Deepika Padukone, Kamal Hasan to name a few ). Of course, the people I've mentioned have a pan-India / global body of work, hence are covered by multiple newspapers and have more reference sources. I will be mindful of the TOI perception. AnamikaWrites (talk) 13:27, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See The Times of India, Paid news section, to understand why its value as a reliable source is suspect. David notMD (talk) 17:36, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shorter

I recommend changing "Awards and nominations" to "Awards" and then removing all the Nomination entries. David notMD (talk) 11:13, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi AnamikaWrites! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Draft:Pratik Sen - support to write the article that can be submitted and accepted by Wikipedia, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pratik Sen (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Itcouldbepossible was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pratik Sen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pratik Sen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Itcouldbepossible ^Talk 04:41, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pratik Sen (August 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RPSkokie were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pratik Sen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RPSkokie (talk) 05:55, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RPSkokie, thanks for the feedback. Much appreciated.

The article in fact was edited and reframed to make it more neutral by one of the Wikipedia reviewers. Therefore, keen to get a better understanding of sections that still do not represent a NPOV. Also keen to understand,

- the evaluation and assessment of a subject warranting a Wikipedia article. While I do understand notability very well - I've read the section many, many times, I do believe Pratik Sen has sufficient notability in his line of work and industry to warrant a Wikipedia page like several of his peers and colleagues from the industry across regions. I have always considered Wikipedia as an encyclopaedia that is global and recognizes dynamics of a country, its diversity and high interest groups within that country/ language diaspora. Which is evident from Wikipedia pages created on artists who have just made their debut in the Indian film industry.

- The references used in the Draft:Pratik Sen are not created by me nor by the subject. The articles are published in very reliable news media. While publications like Times of India (TOI) is rated by Wikipedia to be inclined towards the ruling government of India, it cannot be the brush stroke for all articles published by TOI. By the same yardstick, the Indian Express and The Hindu are considered/perceived to be inclined to the opposition - but Wikipedia rates it as reliable source.

I am truly keen to have this article published and therefore any in-depth guidance or inputs with examples will be helpful.

Thanks ---- AnamikaWrites (talk) 15:18, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pratik Sen has been accepted

Pratik Sen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~Kvng (talk) 15:54, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. This is extremely encouraging to create, expand and edit multiple articles ---- AnamikaWrites (talk) 16:09, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atithi (2019) (June 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Atithi (2019) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:58, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Radaan Mediaworks seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 16:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Radhika Sarathkumar

I agree the spelling is Radikaa. You please open an RM regarding this. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:58, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Atithi (2019)

Hello, AnamikaWrites. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Atithi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:38, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pratik Sen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atithi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]