User talk:An account

a throw away account registered to create two redirects, whose moronic idea was this anyway? —Preceding unsigned comment added by An account (talk • contribs)

Holodomor edits

Please stop reintroducing edits to Holodomor that have not met consensus. Wikipedia adheres to a strict NPOV policy. Thank you. TheQuandry 23:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POV edits

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Holodomor, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. TheQuandry 01:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Use the Talk page

Every article has a talk page, use that to discuss the issues on why you think the cat should be there. Unless you want to have the same fate as User:Vernyhora who got blocked indefinetely because he had the same partisan approach. --Kuban Cossack 10:15, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Undiscussed POV edits and single-purpose accounts

Please STOP reintroducing POV edits to Holodomor. User:Vernyhora and User:Saguer have both been blocked indefinitely for continuing with this revert war against consensus. Single-purpose accounts who only serve to engage in revert wars always end up being blocked. In your own unsigned comment above (on your own talk page, no less) you pretty much confess that this account exists for a singular purpose which is NOT to benefit Wikipedia. As I told others before you, revert wars will not make people change their minds. If you want to debate the issue, discuss it on the talk page. Maybe through dialogue you'll even learn something you didn't know before. TheQuandry 16:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chekcuser?

would also like to request a cross check between the following, engaged in pushing soviet pov in the article:

   * Kuban kazak (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log)
   * Irpen (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log)
   * Grafikm fr (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log)

I don't think they could be sock puppets, they're most probably different users engaged in Soviet propaganda pushing, just like here: [1] and here [2]. Anyway, the time is not running in their favour: [3] [4] Constanz - Talk 08:59, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possible improper username

Hello. I believe your username may be improper as it is too generic to distinguish you from other accounts. Please consider asking to have it changed to something more specific. TheQuandry 19:32, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]