User talk:AnEditor1234
Hello, you made a mistake in deleting the image from my edited infobox, can you please undo the deletion? Muzicluver1996 (talk) 15:13, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
AnEditor1234, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi AnEditor1234! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 23 November 2018 (UTC) |
...
[edit]You are just not fair. Stop acting like you all know about these singers more than we people from balkans ourselves. Block me if you want, but I am just telling the truth, while you are always making false informations. Србија24 (talk) 21:32, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Warning Users
[edit]Hi, I'm User:Jebcubed, and I noticed that you don't seem to be warning people you whose edits you revert because they are vandalism. I would suggest using the Twinkle tool under the gadgets section of your preferences. It makes warning users much faster. Thanks, Jebcubed (talk) 23:07, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
December 2018
[edit]
Hello, I'm Qualitist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Drew Bledsoe have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Qualitist (talk) 15:51, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Can you explain why you made this revert? As far as I can see the edit that you reverted was an uncontrovertial copyedit that improved the article. I see that you warned the unregistered user for vandalism, so I'd be interested to know if I'm missing something. Thanks, Wham2001 (talk) 19:37, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- In the absence of a reply I have reinstated the edit. Best, Wham2001 (talk) 04:33, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
This user's edits are not vandalism. If you look closely, you will find a COI issue which {{uw-coi}} is more appropriate. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 13:24, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Rollbacker
[edit]
I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 22:12, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
A goat for you!
[edit]
|
A Goat | |
I award you with this goat, what you do with it is up to you. Rodrigo Valequez(🗣) 21:43, 19 April 2020 (UTC)|}
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
|