User talk:Amyleequeer

Welcome!

Hello, Amyleequeer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 04:16, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, I'm C.Fred. Your recent edit to the page Meat appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 04:16, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Meat. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Meat was changed by Amyleequeer (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.917644 on 2016-03-13T04:16:56+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:16, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Meat. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 04:26, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Meat. Lazylaces (Talk to me) 04:33, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 04:36, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This edit [1] is unacceptable. You appear to be trying to use Wikipedia to advocate a fringe point of view. The practice of veganism isn't a fringe lifestyle, but the assertion that humans are naturally vegan is. Wikipedia gives precedence to mainstream academic sources, which generally posit that a shift to at least some meat consumption played a role in human evolution. References that are explicitly agenda-driven are not acceptable on Wikipedia. Acroterion (talk) 04:43, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]