User talk:Amy Covington

Speedy deletion of Hatashe Channel

A tag has been placed on Hatashe Channel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 23:14, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Hatashe for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Benea (talk) 23:55, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Baro Vatra

Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. De728631 (talk) 23:58, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Big Bhatra, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 23:58, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

• The above was a bit cruel. But for goodness sake learn about redirects! — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 00:10, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

August 2008

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Please use redirects rather than creating so many articles that "may refer to" something else without being a disambiguation page. Toddst1 (talk) 19:51, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Nanikhir, you will be blocked from editing. Toddst1 (talk) 19:55, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 19:58, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Son Vita

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Son Vita, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Benea (talk) 20:37, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hatashe Channel

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hatashe Channel, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Benea (talk) 20:40, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Hatashe Channel

I have nominated Hatashe Channel, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hatashe Channel. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Toddst1 (talk) 13:34, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Son Vita

I have nominated Son Vita, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Son Vita. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ironholds 07:10, 6 August 2008 (UTC)