User talk:Amxitsa

This user may have left Wikipedia. Amxitsa has not edited Wikipedia since December 2012. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, Amxitsa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Tim | meep in my general direction 22:44, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of films by letter

Thanks for adding films to the list of films by letter. However, when adding films, please ignore adding films with a "The" article at the end of the title. The rest of the titles in all of the lists are all listed by the second capitalized word in the title of the film. You can just go ahead and add it as the title is written. You can see more guidelines for adding films on the lists' talk pages. But thanks again for adding films, we need all the help we can get to update them. --Nehrams2020 22:32, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Emmerdale Changes

I have noticed you have taken an interest in improving Emmerdale's articles. It's great to see others who are showing a keen interest to get Emmerdale up to the same sort of standard as Eastenders, for example. Could I ask that when you tag article talk pages for ratings, you also amend the Assessment Scale of such articles accordingly. If anything, to keep an accurate track of which articles are more needy for improvement and expansion to help others contribute. Again great work and hopefully we are on track to getting Emmerdale up to the right standard! Bungle44 15:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't noticed that there was an Assessment Scale for Emmerdale articles, I have been tagging pages but have also created the pages for the categories so for example we now have pages such as Category:Stub-Class Emmerdale articles which allow us to see all of the stub class entries for example. Do you think it is much easier to see the position if we have a separate assessment scale page? I will contine to tag articles for now, and can then always use these category pages to update the assessment scale in one big update once I am finished. The only issue I see with this is keeping it up to date when people who are not working with the project change the assessment whereas the category pages will automatically update themselves. --Amxitsa 15:28, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most Wikiprojects I have seen operate a similar sort of system, whereby contributers can add to a list tagged articles, with brief summaries of what may need to be done in order to keep the project's articles to a good standard (for example, the Video Games Wikiproject use an assessment page which can be found here, as well as categories for keeping track of articles within the wikiproject scope). I understand what you are saying about one big update, and maybe that will be the best idea, but dependant upon how long it'll be until every article has it's own tagged rating. One thing about the Assessment scale is the ability to have all article ratings consolidated into a single location, as opposed to being scattered across multiple categories; although of course as you mentioned, that does rely upon regular updates. Bungle44 15:54, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

French films

THanks for starting the french films I would love to get all the notable films written in the lists and articles on them!!! Are you interested? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" "S.P.E.C.T.R.E"} 19:01, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great idea!! There are sooooo many missing films!!All the best ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" "S.P.E.C.T.R.E"} 15:37, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was in the middle of compiling the entire list io fmissing filsm at Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/List of films without article/List of missing French Films but I only got to M before being sidetract I think. Feel free to use it ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" "S.P.E.C.T.R.E"} 15:38, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/List of films without article/List of missing French Films:A-B have been wikified already ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" "S.P.E.C.T.R.E"} 15:40, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from me too for helping out in the lists. I got curious about the wiki specific link you have in your page. Is it part of Wikipedia? Are there more such specific websites? Hoverfish Talk 19:20, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link to the list. That's what I was looking for. Very interesting! Hoverfish Talk 21:36, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great work with the list, really a broader coverage on French films is much needed. Happy editing, STTW (talk) 15:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another Wild Idea

I realize it's an older edit, but you don't need to made cast lists into tables. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines calls for a simple list as you had it the first time. Thanks for the hard work! SkierRMH 01:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it would be better we all agree about this and we use the simple *[[Actor]] as "Role" listing. As for your work, it's amazing! Hoverfish Talk 19:49, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I had been experimenting with the tables since looking at pages like Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl and Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (film) but most of the films do already seem set up as a simple list. Most of the films I am working on at the minute don't have cast lists but I will put them as ordinary lists when they do to try and keep some consistency between pages --Amxitsa 09:26, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's been a bit of a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines, doesn't seem to be much opposition about putting the 'no tables' into the section on cast, but I've been waiting a bit before actually making the change. There's additional rationale about the reasons not to do this that I hadn't thought of! SkierRMH 16:04, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Great Wall.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Great Wall.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:09, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lil Chris

Lil Chris has received some heavy editing recently. Would you please read over the article and make any necessary changes. Thanks. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 19:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Alien_Contamination.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Alien_Contamination.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:53, 10 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 09:53, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the WikiProject Doctor Who Assessment Committee

Amxitsa...Thank you for agreeing to be part of the Assessment Committee of WikiProject Doctor Who. Please stop by the talk page to discuss how the articles will be assessed. To denote your participation in this committee on the main project page, you can use the following image next to your user name. Image:Gnome-searchtool blue.svg

Thank you for taking the time to assess these articles. - LA @ 22:56, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again...There is a discussion on the importance of Doctor Who articles on the Doctor Who Assessment talk page. Please stop by and comment as this may have an impact on articles you have already assessed. - LA @ 21:04, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who Award

		The WikiProject Doctor Who Award
		Thank you for helping with the assessment of the Doctor Who articles. - LA @ 00:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Arroseur Arrose.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Arroseur Arrose.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:34, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Autour d'une cabine.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Autour d'une cabine.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:52, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Barque.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Barque.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:29, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Carmencita.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Carmencita.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Carmencita.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. BJ^Talk 11:22, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction of 'C' class articles

Hi. This is a cross-post to members of the Doctor Who assessment committee. Because of the introduction of the 'C' class, the general criteria for assessment has been changed. Please familiarise yourself with the new criteria and help migrate several Start- and B-Class articles into the C-Class category. Thank you! Sceptre ^(talk) 22:36, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:SortiedesOuvriersdel1895-01.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SortiedesOuvriersdel1895-01.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:51, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:SortiedesOuvriersdel1895-01.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:SortiedesOuvriersdel1895-01.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:18, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Attackpuppet.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Attackpuppet.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.

If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 19:38, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Diamond-ray.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Diamond-ray.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 15:23, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Teela's Quest.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Teela's Quest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 15:39, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:La Mer.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:La Mer.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:55, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alien Contamination.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alien Contamination.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:34, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Audio theatre an article to audio dramas

Please if you have time and you know anything to it (I have seen that you have made edits in the article area which owns relations on it) , please look on the article Audio theatre, somebody placed a erase discussion on it. after we have had a merge discussion. It would be interesting what you would say to the merge and the delete discussion. )-: --Soenke Rahn (talk) 03:34, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who story chronology

Hi. It's good that you added all those stories, but the edit history of the article got really flooded. It's generally considered better to add these things all at once. I apologize if there was a practical reason you couldn't do that. In any case, please keep contributing. -- Noneofyourbusiness (talk) 14:31, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Neuville-sur-Saône- Débarquement du congrès des photographes à Lyon.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Neuville-sur-Saône- Débarquement du congrès des photographes à Lyon.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:44, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Les Forgerons.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Les Forgerons.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:45, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Les Forgerons.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Les Forgerons.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:01, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Carmencita Title Card.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Carmencita Title Card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:28, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dolphins (2007 film)

The article Dolphins (2007 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The main issue of this film is it only meet half of the WP:MOVIE criteria stating "the film is widely distributed" regardless that it appear to go released unnoticed but the reception part is not at all a review, it is an news edit of a press release describing the film.

All other else, it fails all other criteria for "other evidence of notability", also for reliable third party source, they do exist (via its own website) but these are more like news edits of press releases for local papers.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donnie Park (talk) 15:46, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dolphins Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dolphins Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dolphins1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dolphins1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hyppyjä listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hyppyjä. Since you had some involvement with the Hyppyjä redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Sideways713 (talk) 10:08, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ram Man listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ram Man. Since you had some involvement with the Ram Man redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:03, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Neuville-sur-Saône- Débarquement du congrès des photographes à Lyon.jpg

The file File:Neuville-sur-Saône- Débarquement du congrès des photographes à Lyon.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, too low-resolution and blurry for future encyclopedic use. Has been superseded in the article with a larger, clearer image from the film ([:File:Lumières Le Débarquement du Congrès de Photographie à Lyon 1895.png]).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★ Bigr Tex 03:16, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]