User talk:Amuzick

Alan Callan

Please don't remove fact tags without providing reliable sources. Just making a claim that Callan said in an early interview that his first ambition was to work in art without providing a source which proves this, violates WP:BLP. Woogee (talk) 00:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thankyou for this and your guidance - am happy to try and make sense of the demands and work with any genuine editor, but actually, whomever is attacking the page is totally inaccurate. if you are ready to dialogue on this, please let me know. meanwhile the first rule is to have a verifiable source and it is not possible to verify callan manged led zeppelin, because a. he didnt and b. he has claimed he did. i am afraid there is malice going on that needs to be reported. in the same way it is wrong to propose he foun ded something which was then closed by a third party without mentioning both facts. again that is malice. please advise how we might develop this dialogue and identify who is doing this. thankyou for your time.

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Alan Callan, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Alan Callan was changed by Amuzick (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-01-22T21:50:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:50, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

remove all content as that remaining after vandalism was neither accurate or unbiased.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Alan Callan. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:05, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please be sure that when you add something to an article about a living person, that you provide reliable sources for your claims. In addition, how does www.timbu.to have anything to do with Alan Callan? Woogee (talk) 05:37, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re editorial advice

clearly there is a flame against alan callan. it is pointless trying to contribute when those that follow only want inaccurate and unverifiable information : examples - (callan is an american businessman - inaccurate callan is european) or, callan is best known as manager of led zeppelin - he has never claimed that -see the external link re peter grant who was manager and for whom callan worked and whose eulogy callan spoke and whom callan has always acknolwedged - see also peter grant the man who led zeppelin which provided most of the source material on callans relationship with led zeppelin). to complain about endeavors to make the fuller article (which was vandalised) accurate, is to violate the privilege of being able to contribute. i have to ask, did the vandal also edit my comments on biblical studies or buddhism on wiki or is it just alan callan they want misrepresented?

Talk:Alan Callan

Removal of other people's edits in Talk pages is considered vandalism. Please don't do that again. Woogee (talk) 05:39, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]