User talk:AmusedRepose

Welcome to my talk page

Please, don't spam the talk page.

Perilla_oil

Sorry, I rolled back you edit by mistake, I have added it again to the article. Uirauna (talk) 20:35, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Boo.

And don't you really think it's time to archive your talk page? --AmusedRepose (talk) 13:45, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Hola, AR!

Archived, per your request. :) I hadn't seen you since December of last year. What's up? Firsfron of Ronchester 09:29, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Hey! Sorry to hear about the hard times. You have e-mail. Thanks for the reference offer; quite nice of you. You take "stay quiet and keep out of trouble" too seriously... you haven't edited in a year, you know! Firsfron of Ronchester 05:36, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Nice user page! :) Firsfron of Ronchester 05:19, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Not so minor

Just a heads up. You may wish to uncheck the box "Mark all edits minor by default" in your preferences. Edits such as the one you made on Wizard Sticks are definitely not minor. --Millbrooky (talk) 17:09, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Harald Siiak

Hi, could you restore this article, the guy is a significant figure in Estonian music. There is even a book published on the guy [1]. Thanks. Martintg (talk) 21:00, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Kristian Vilhelm Koren Schjelderup, Jr.

On 28 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kristian Vilhelm Koren Schjelderup, Jr., which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 20:57, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Hi AmusedRepose, and thanks for supporting my successful request for adminship. It was nice to see all the kind comments I got from my supporters and I hope that I will be more useful to the community now that I have the tools again.--Berig (talk) 15:44, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback

Thanks for your input at my successful Rfa. I'm already thinking about working on my content creation. Hopefully in a few months, I'll have passed the point where you would've !voted Support. If you have any more suggestions on how I can improve myself as an editor, I'd be happy to hear them. Happy editing!--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 21:23, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Kings

I totally rewrote Kings (drinking game). Please check out the new version. Do you still feel that it should be deleted? hmwithτ 19:14, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Just a quick question: since you're the nom and now you're supporting the article being kept, do you want me to process it as a withdrawn AfD? EVula // talk // ☯ // 20:15, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

RfA

This snarky response was highly unnecessary, and I'm unsure why you've become so frustrated. Regardless, I firmly believe RfA is a discussion, so I often respond to comments I disagree with; in this case, I was unsure if you were aware that "no need" is generally considered a weak argument, and as a result I provided a link to that essay, which I happen to agree with. Apologies if you feel my remark was inappropriate. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:31, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

On that note, I've sent you an e-mail. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 23:20, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Childish

Do you look like a child? No way to know without a picture. But with edit summaries like this, you're certainly acting like one. Be civil and mature, please. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:33, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

My RfA

Don't worry 'bout it. I'll admit that I didn't mind your oppose so much - it was more than a one line saying "not enough content creation" ;). Although I can't say I don't disagree with some of it, but your talk page isn't the place for that. So, thank you for your civil message, and maybe we'll see each other around :). (Oh, BTW, you're looking for "administrative" =P) - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 16:31, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Economics census

Hello there. Sorry to bother you, but you are (titularly at least) a member of WP:WikiProject Economics, as defined by this category. If you don't know me, I'm a Wikipedia administrator, but an unqualified economist. I enjoy writing about economics, but I'm not very good at it, which is why I would like to support in any way I can the strong body of economists here on Wikipedia. I'm only bothering you because you are probably one of them. Together, I'd like us to establish the future direction of WikiProject Economics, but first, we need to know who we've got to help.

Whatever your area of expertise or level of qualification, if you're interested in helping with the WikiProject (even if only as part of a larger commitment to this wonderful online encyclopedia of ours), would you mind adding your signature to this page? It only takes a second. Thank you.

Message delivered on behalf of User:Jarry1250 by LivingBot.