User talk:Amuel Gins

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Amuel Gins! Thank you for your contributions. I am KennethSides and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

KennethSides (talk) 19:58, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Interracial marriage with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 08:01, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Miscegenation with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 08:01, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I request an apology for this false accusation. If you actually read my edit, you would see that I essentially rewrote just one sentence (deleting the adjective "chinese" from "tanka", since the tanka are not ethnic Chinese), and I added more information and citations, including one that stated tanka were not chinese.Amuel Gins (talk) 20:11, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So I falsely accused you of vandalism, removing content, and not leaving an edit summary? 1) Did you remove content? Yes. 2) Did you leave an edit summary? No. Did I accuse you of vandalism? No. Did MaterialScientist accuse you of vandalism? No. An apology from me? I don't think so. Maybe you should apologize to MaterialScientist and I for your false accusations? If you want to avoid this cycle in the future, you really should consider using the edit summary and maybe notes in the article talk section when you make changes. If you don't you will likely get reverted by others, if not by me. I would also suggest reading wp:civil as well as the rest of the wp:five pillars Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 22:10, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You falsely claimed that my references were not accesible (when the google books links were in plain view), and you accused me of making stuff up. Materialscientist also insulted by english grammar on the talk page of the article, when I had been in fact correcting the article's grammar and vandalism. Sevilledade and Warriorspride mutilated the article by deleting words and changing plural words to singular, and when I fixed the grammar I get accused of being incoherent?

The fact that you claimed you couldn't access my sources shows that you did not bother reading my edits on the article itself before you reverted them,(anyone who read it carefully can see the google book link, which you did not) and you just saw the reference templates on the revisions and assumed I was adding massive blocks of texts. I am also a three month editor, not a new guy who suddenly popped up.Amuel Gins (talk) 22:17, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You mind explaining why you thought my references were not accesible when I had a direct link to google books? Did you read the text in the "read" version of the article, or did you only look at the edit revision and saw a mass of words you didn't bother to read? You didn't explain your false claim that the references were not accesible. The only words I removed was material saying that the tanka were chinese. I brought in references that said they were not.

And why should I apologize when Materialscientist reverted the entire article to a vandalized version? I even explained in the edit summary of Tanka people that Warriorspride had vandalized the article before Materialscientist reverted it.

And again why should I apologize when materialscientist violated protocol by not informing me when he brought me up at ANI? What happened to assuming good faith (and even bothering to leave a note on my talk page about his suspicions).Amuel Gins (talk) 23:11, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

comment of mine at ANI

I have placed a comment concerning you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#user:Amuel Gins--Racerx11 (talk) 01:33, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I will no longer post there or anywhere else on the non-issue. --Racerx11 (talk) 06:49, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]