User talk:Amsphd
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Amsphd, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:02, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
A request for peer review
[edit]Hello, Amsphd, Aquarius2018 here from our WikiFellows Wednesday cohort. Would you do me the kind favor peer review of the Clarke Tucker article I expanded before I migrate it over to the common space? I appreciate it. And, Please, do it at your own convenience. Thank you. Aquarius2018 (talk) 00:21, 4 August 2018 (UTC)Aquarius2018Aquarius2018 (talk) 00:21, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Notes
[edit]Hi! Here are my notes:
- The article occasionally reads like it's pro-Houlahan, so be very careful of this. Also, avoid any point of view statements like "important", since what's considered important will be relative to the reader. Other things to avoid are words like "passions" or "passion for", as these are seen as inherently promotional on Wikipedia since they're considered to be routine marketing speak. Basically, we want to make sure that this doesn't read like a website for the politician. Most of this is going to be just tweaking the writing here and there. I'd look over Gayatri's article on Fayrouz Saad, as she's done a good job of editing it for tone.
- Something I do have to caution you on is that political nominees are not considered to be inherently notable per WP:POLOUTCOMES. What this means is that the article will need more coverage for Houlahan that doesn't deal with her running for the House of Representatives. The reason for this is that at present the coverage looks to be almost solely about her political campaign, so if she doesn't win the race it could be argued that Houlahan isn't notable outside of the run and that the article should be redirected into a list of candidates for this campaign. The POLOUTCOMES link gives a bit more information on this.
You've done well so far, so this just needs more polishing overall. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:34, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Chrissy Houlahan for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chrissy Houlahan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chrissy Houlahan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Marquardtika (talk) 16:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)