User talk:Amphis

Welcome!

Hello, Amphis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --玉米^ō^麦兜 17:35, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

Category of Drag Kings

I would like to question the inclusion of Male Impersonators of the period 1900 tp 1950 in this category.

I believe that the term "Drag King" is only used where there is a homosexual element involved. Entertainers like Hetty King and Vesta Tilly used drag as a "trade mark" and there was little sexual input in their performances. Similarly, Pantomime "Dames" are often in drag but solely for the comic advantage. Principle Boys were originally, in Victorian times, were played by women to show off the female legs, hardly a homosexual trick.

I would suggest the removal of the above mentioned artists from this category.

DonJay 00:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

inappropriate deletion from human penis size

Your deletion of a photo of an exceptionally large penis clothed by pants from the article human penis size was inappropriate. Please consider reverting your edit. Thank you. JPatrickBedell 19:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your allegations about fictional books of reference

I saw that you had written on Talk:Nix:

There are almost no references in the text at all, the external links are third-hand sources as well, and the one book listed with its ISBN is fiction.

I can assure you that the book listed with its ISBN is not fiction, but a very real book that I have in my book shelf. When you look for a book by using the ISBN, be aware of the fact that all ISBN databases don't have all the books. If you had tried the Swedish Royal Library's database, you would have found this and you won't have needed to accuse other editors of making up fictional books.--Berig 11:26, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Phantom blot.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Phantom blot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:21, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Body Alchemy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Body Alchemy.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:07, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Vallhalla 12.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Vallhalla 12.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:40, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yule Goat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Epiphany (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Diagram

Just a note that I have removed the diagram, and you can discuss it in the talk page - Talk:2019–20 coronavirus outbreak#Dubious diagram. Hzh (talk) 15:04, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]