User talk:Amirsirfamir

Amirsirfamir, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Amirsirfamir! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Doctree (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

My sandbox

Copyright issues

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:44, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:53, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amirsirfamir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry for what I did and now I hope that I'll done my best so please unblock me I want to edit my user page

Decline reason:

Sorry, but we don't unblock accounts evading a block from less than two weeks ago. Future unblock requests should come from your main account. You'll have to address the concerns of the original block, as well as the block evasion. Mike V • Talk 19:40, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amirsirfamir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry for what I did and now I want to edit pages in a write way. So please unblock me

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. Mike V • Talk 19:40, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amirsirfamir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked because I issued wrong copyright licence this is due to fact that I didn't knew about image uploading but now I have read the whole tutorial of copyright tags and I hope I'll be batter this time So please unblock me

Decline reason:

You are blocked because you abused multiple accounts. You have not addressed this. If you continue to misuse the unblock template, you will lose access to this page. SQL ^{Query me!} 06:21, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Even as of today you continue to create new accounts to evade your block and continue adding copyright violations to articles. You are ensuring that others know that your word means nothing and that you should not be unblocked under any circumstances in order to protect the encyclopedia.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:41, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amirsirfamir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked due to sock popets so please unblock me

Decline reason:

Making such a request from a sock account shows that you do not understand the issues. You rather recently created new socks; you should stop that and try a standard offer approach. Huon (talk) 11:41, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser note As you are still socking I've pulled talk page access to stop the frivolous requests. You can use WP:UTRS in the future.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:53, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]