User talk:Amethystloucks

Welcome Amethystloucks!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 40,992,461 registered editors!

Hello Amethystloucks. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:

Introduction to Wikipedia

The five pillars of Wikipedia

Editing tutorial

How to edit a page

Simplified Manual of Style

The basics of Wikicode

How to develop an article

How to create an article

Help pages

What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:

Do be bold

Do assume good faith

Do be civil

Do keep cool!

Do maintain a neutral point of view

Don't spam

Don't infringe copyright

Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest

Don't commit vandalism

Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:

Ask a question

or you can:

Get help at the Teahouse

or even:

Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:

Fight vandalism

Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome

Help contribute to articles

Perform maintenance tasks

Become a member of a project that interests you

Help design new templates

Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost

Translate articles from Wikipedias in other languages

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your userpage.

Please remember to:

Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.

The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 18:45, 20 February 2021 (UTC) (Leave me a message)[reply]

Welcome

Hi, Just a quick note. Could you please stop deleting references due to link rot. There are processes for dealing with dead links. You can find out more at WP:404 which should explain how you can help us fix these issues. Glad to have you with us and thanks for understanding!

Thanks! Bailo26 Talk to me 02:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A lengthy welcome

Hi Amethystloucks. Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily in collaboration.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal (talk) 01:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 16:57, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bundled citations

Hello,Amethystloucks, you asked a question at Talk:Same-sex marriage#References regarding bundled references, for example here and here. No, bundled citations are not typical, but they are not prohibited, either. It may be an attempt to mitigate WP:CITECLUTTER. I don't particularly like the way they did it in that article, and I may attempt some changes there. Sometimes it's done well; see for example, Holocaust denial#References.

As far as where to ask your question, you have a choice: the article talk page was fine, if you meant it specifically about how to improve that one article. Or, if you meant it more generally, you could ask at the WP:Tea house, or the WP:Help desk. You can also ask at the talk page of an editor you trust, or right here on your Talk page, by asking your question in a new section below, and adding {{Help me}} to your message. Hope this helps, Mathglot (talk) 23:01, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your references for reliability

Hi Amethystloucks . I noticed that you recently used thefamouspeople.com as a source for biographical information in Candice King. Please note that the general consensus as expressed at WP:RSN is that it does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. I've gone ahead and removed it. If you disagree, let's discuss it. This is the second time your editing has come up in routine searches for clearly unreliable sources. Please check WP:RSP and WP:RSN to help determine if a source is reliable. Thanks.--Hipal (talk) 01:24, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hipal: Ok, thanks for that! I'll look into that. Amethystloucks (talk) 15:40, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you read this page?

If you do, please reply. Numerous editors are attempting to engage you here on your User talk page, and if you're aware of that, it would help to know that, so that editors know they are not wasting their time attempting to help you by leaving you messages here. You can reply to this message, by clicking the little [edit] link top right of this section, and pasting {{Reply|Mathglot}} into your message. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 09:12, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mathglot: Hi! I am seeing the message. I wasn't aware people are looking for a response, so thanks for that! Amethystloucks (talk) 19:33, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NYPL edit-a-thons

You might like to reach out to User:Kosboot, I'm also available and glad to help.--Pharos (talk) 20:25, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Queering Wikipedia 2021 User Group Working Days: May 14–16

The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.

We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.

More information, and registration details, at QW2021.--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Edit on Gender didn't work

On Gender you made an edit to the about notice on the page, stating there was an extra bar. It actually broke the notice, so please look at previews before you publish edits Tranman64 (talk) 01:48, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tranman64: Hey! I did preview it, and it didn't look like it broke the notice, hence why I published it. I'll double check next time that happens.Amethystloucks (talk) 15:19, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replying on Talk pages, including this one

None of your comments using the "reply" template above are working, because you've enclosed them in another template that you presumably copied out of the wiki code of the page. In order to reply to me, for example, you need to type two left curly brackets, the word reply (or, Reply), a vertical bar, my username, and two right curly brackets. Usual placement is at the beginning of your message, but you can place it anywhere you want. Please see WP:THREAD for details on how to reply to previous comments on Talk pages, including this one. That page also explains the proper use of indentation to set off your comments, from someone else's.

See if you can reply to me below, using the "reply" template, along with correct indentation (per WP:THREAD), and, of course, your signature at the end using WP:4TILDES (but, you already knew that!). If you don't hear back from me within a day or so, that means it didn't work. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 00:13, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mathglot: That makes sense. I see that it's different now, thanks! Amethystloucks (talk) 19:32, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This time, it worked! So, congrats, and keep doing it that way when responding to other editors, whether here, or at article talk pages, and you'll have no more problems with this. One tricky thing to know about: if you make a mistake with the {{Reply}} template, like, let's say you misspell my name, you can't simply go back and fix it later, it won't work. Instead, you have to add another {{reply}} or {{ping}}, and it has to be on a completely new line, not tacked on to the end of your previous message. So, if I notice a typo after the fact, what I do, is add an indented line below my own message, with the text, : Fix ping – {{reply|SomeUserName}} ~~~~ with the correct spelling of the username, and save it. Hope this helps, Mathglot (talk) 20:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lewiston Public Library (Lewiston, New York), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Citation overkill

Please take a look at the essay at Wikipedia:Citation overkill and the guidelines at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section#Citations. It's almost never necessary to cite everything in the infobox because it will either be uncontentious or cited elsewhere in the article. Celia Homeford (talk) 16:08, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Celia Homeford:, thanks for the update! I didn't know that. I'm glad to learn something new! I'll work on it in the future. Amethystloucks (talk) 00:35, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Mary II of England. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You claimed that Alison Weir said Mary II became queen on her coronation on 11 April 1689, but Weir does not say that. She says she was proclaimed queen on 13 February 1689 and crowned on 11 April. As clearly explained in the article text and the sources given therein, it is not possible to give an exact accession date because of the confused nature of the accession, and various dates are given. Mary II is a featured article and has already gone through a review process to check its accuracy. The dates are verified and given in the sources listed. DrKay (talk) 07:10, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please also see Help:Minor edit: adding a reference is not a minor edit. DrKay (talk) 07:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Book burning, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adirondack Experience, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blue Mountain Lake.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MOS and coordinates

I notice you have been adding extremely long decimal coordinates to articles. Google has taken to providing 16-digit coordinates in what is believed to be a copyright trap scheme. That level of precision is in the 1/100th of a micrometre range. WP:OPCOORD calls for rounding the coordinates (tldr: use DD°MM'SS" or D.dddd° for everything). Abductive (reasoning) 20:20, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Abductive Got it, thank you! Amethystloucks (talk) 22:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]