User talk:Amelia Paige

Welcome back!

I am glad that you got your account back. The next few months are going to be a lot of fun! GastelEtzwane (talk) 20:46, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First name or last name ?

By the way, should biographical articles refer to the person in question by their first or last name? --Amelia Paige (talk) 21:56, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I assume that you mean the article title ? In that case, first name, middle name, last name. If it is within the article, it all depends on the style of the article. Usually one refers to a person using the last name. Just look up a few articles and you will see... GastelEtzwane (talk) 11:33, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Breakfast

Hello, Amelia Paige. You are invited to join WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of breakfast-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:15, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Author Andrea Hairston .jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Author Andrea Hairston .jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 04:48, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Author Andrea Hairston .jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Author Andrea Hairston .jpg, which you've attributed to http://aalbc.com/authors/andrea_hairston.htm. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:24, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cœur de pirate discography

Hello. The Cœur de pirate discography is currently at FLC. Please leave comments to help this reach Featured List status. Thanks! :) – Underneath-it-All (talk) 01:02, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rankersbo (talk) 09:04, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thal Nature Park

Hello Amelia Paige,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Thal Nature Park for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Sulfurboy (talk) 13:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zurich Wilderness Park

You need to find some other references for the article. Newspaper articles, scientific reviews and so on. The university library would be a good place to start. You could also find information on the Swiss government website. Obviously, it will take a bit of digging, but the information must be there!

You could also try to link your article to other pages like Sihl Valley (you might prefer Sihlwald even if it is currently a redirect) or Langnau am Albis.

GastelEtzwane (talk) 10:24, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aargau Jura Park

You might want to add a few more Wiki links to the rivers as well as the two villages mentioned in the article. The Federal Office for the Environment should link to Federal Department of Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications unless you want to create the article!

GastelEtzwane (talk) 10:31, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Aargau Jura Park, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jamesx12345 (talk) 16:12, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aargau Jura Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:58, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Zurich Wilderness Park, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LionMans Account (talk) 16:35, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]