User talk:AmeliaTheCheeseGrater

November 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Margaret Thatcher, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Amortias (T)(C) 20:49, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So the template obviously had no effect - seriously though your user page specifically states "My only activities here are reverting acts of stupidity and edit terrorism". Adding an incorrect name to an info box seems to be completely counter-intuitive to your stated aim here. Amortias (T)(C) 20:53, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 18:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AmeliaTheCheeseGrater (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am very sorry for vandalising the page on margaret thatcher. I did not realise calling her a milk snatcher would get me permanently blocked, but looking back and thinking about my actions I can very easily see why what I did was wrong and why I should not have vandalised her page. Please consider my unblock request as I promise I will not vandalise another page again and will begin to make good faith contributions to wikipedia instead of vandalism AmeliaTheCheeseGrater (talk) 22:31, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not sure why you are claiming this was just a single instance on a single article. You've demonstrated disruptive editing across a variety of articles. Yamla (talk) 22:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.